ArticleCurrent microbiology2019
Species Diversity and Functional Prediction of Soil Bacterial Communities in Constructed Wetlands with Different Plant Conditions.
Article in Current microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of biochar on the growth of Vallisneria natans in surface flow constructed wetland.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diversities of soil bacterial communities in the Phragmites australis, Phalaris arundinacea, and non-plantation constructed wetlands were compared and analyzed by through high-throughput Illumina sequencing. At the phylum level, the ten dominant bacterial phyla in the three types of constructed wetlands were the same. At the genus level, the three most dominant bacterial genera in the three types of constructed wetlands were the same. The non-plantation constructed wetland (Nop-cw) had the highest diversity of soil bacterial community. The introduction of P. australis or P. arundinacea did not increase diversity of the soil bacterial communities in the constructed wetlands but greatly changed the compositions and potential function of the soil bacterial communities, especially some bacterial genera involved in pollutant removal. So it was predicted that the P. australis constructed wetland (Pau-cw) had a larger capacity for the removal of heavy metals and sulfur than the P. arundinacea constructed wetland (Par-cw), and the nitrification capacity of the P. arundinacea constructed wetland was stronger than that of the P. australis constructed wetland. The above results not only clarified the differences among the soil bacterial communities of the constructed wetlands with different plants in terms of diversity but also revealed the decontamination mechanism of the constructed wetlands to some degree.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30680440What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.