ArticleMicrobial ecology2019
The Dynamic of a River Model Bacterial Community in Two Different Media Reveals a Divergent Succession and an Enhanced Growth of Most Strains Compared to Monocultures.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrological regime of a continental river system predicts bacterial macroecological patterns.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Deciphering Interactions Within a 4-Strain Riverine Bacterial Community.Current microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dynamic of a community of 20 bacterial strains isolated from river water was followed in R2 broth and in autoclaved river water medium for 27 days in batch experiments. At an early stage of incubation, a fast-growing specialist strain, Acinetobater sp., dominated the community in both media. Later on, the community composition in both media diverged but was highly reproducible across replicates. In R2, several strains previously reported to degrade multiple simple carbon sources prevailed. In autoclaved river water, the community was more even and became dominated by several strains growing faster or exclusively in that medium. Those strains have been reported in the literature to degrade complex compounds. Their growth rate in the community was 1.5- to 7-fold greater than that observed in monoculture. Furthermore, those strains developed simultaneously in the community. Together, our results suggest the existence of cooperative interactions within the community incubated in autoclaved river water.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30680433What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.