Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680419›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2019

Training population selection and use of fixed effects to optimize genomic predictions in a historical USA winter wheat panel.

J Martin Sarinelli, J Paul Murphy, Priyanka Tyagi, James B Holland, Jerry W Johnson, Mohamed Mergoum, Richard E Mason, Ali Babar, Stephen Harrison, Russell Sutton and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Natural alleles of LEAFY and WAPO1 interact to regulate spikelet number per spike in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

J Martin SarinelliDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
J Paul MurphyDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Priyanka TyagiDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
James B HollandDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Jerry W JohnsonDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Mohamed MergoumDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Richard E MasonDepartment of Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.
Ali BabarAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Stephen HarrisonDepartment of Agronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Russell SuttonAgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Carl A GriffeyDepartment of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Gina Brown-GuediraDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. gbrowng@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1958-2827
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of Georgia · USLouisiana State University · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Florida · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-67007-25939United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (nifa.usda.gov) Triticeae Coordinated Agricultural Project 2011-68002-30029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageThe optimization of training populations and the use of diagnostic markers as fixed effects increase the predictive ability of genomic prediction models in a cooperative wheat breeding panel. Plant breeding programs often have access to a large amount of historical data that is highly unbalanced, particularly across years. This study examined approaches to utilize these data sets as training populations to integrate genomic selection into existing pipelines. We used cross-validation to evaluate predictive ability in an unbalanced data set of 467 winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes evaluated in the Gulf Atlantic Wheat Nursery from 2008 to 2016. We evaluated the impact of different training population sizes and training population selection methods (Random, Clustering, PEVmean and PEVmean1) on predictive ability. We also evaluated inclusion of markers associated with major genes as fixed effects in prediction models for heading date, plant height, and resistance to powdery mildew (caused by Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici). Increases in predictive ability as the size of the training population increased were more evident for Random and Clustering training population selection methods than for PEVmean and PEVmean1. The selection methods based on minimization of the prediction error variance (PEV) outperformed the Random and Clustering methods across all the population sizes. Major genes added as fixed effects always improved model predictive ability, with the greatest gains coming from combinations of multiple genes. Maximum predictabilities among all prediction methods were 0.64 for grain yield, 0.56 for test weight, 0.71 for heading date, 0.73 for plant height, and 0.60 for powdery mildew resistance. Our results demonstrate the utility of combining unbalanced phenotypic records with genome-wide SNP marker data for predicting the performance of untested genotypes.

Indexed as

GenomicsSeasonsSelection, GeneticAllelesGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisTriticumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID30680419
PMCPMC6449317
OpenAlexW2915021604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.