Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680418›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2020

Patients knowledge and experience with urinary and peripheral intravenous catheters.

Bart J Laan, Pythia T Nieuwkerk, Suzanne E Geerlings

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07172750 (The Effect of Education on Patients' Attitudes Towards Preventing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections and Anxiety After Urologic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07172750 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Education on Patients' Attitudes Towards Preventing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections and Anxiety After Urologic Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsCatheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection, Indwelling Urinary Catheter, Urologic SurgeryArmsEducation on Urinary Catheter Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Urogenital infections.World journal of urology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bart J LaanInternal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-8871
Pythia T NieuwkerkMedical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-1414
Suzanne E GeerlingsInternal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands. s.e.geerlings@amc.uva.nl.

Funding

ZonMw 8392010022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInappropriate use of urinary and intravenous catheters is still frequent. The use of catheters is associated with some serious complications, such as health care associated infections (HAIs). An efficient way to reduce HAIs is to avoid inappropriate use of catheters, but the role for patients in quality improvement initiatives is unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate patients knowledge and experience with catheters, to design patient interventions to reduce inappropriate catheter use.

methodsWe assessed patient's knowledge and experience with catheters using a self report questionnaire, and included patients with a urinary and/or peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) during the baseline measurements of a quality improvement project to reduce inappropriate catheters use.

resultsA total number of 82 patients completed the questionnaire, of which 49 had a urinary catheter and 72 a PIVC. Patients were unaware about the indication for their urinary catheter in 20.9% and PIVC in 19.5%. Nevertheless, 65.3% reported symptoms due to urinary catheters and 37.5% for PIVCs. Interestingly, only 25.5% and 22.4% reported that they would ask their doctor if the catheter could be removed.

conclusionsThere is a lack of knowledge about the indication for having a urinary and peripheral intravenous catheter in a substantial part of patients. Although catheters cause symptoms, patients in general do not ask if the catheter could be removed. Doctors should give more information and ask more questions about catheters to their patients. Quality improvement initiatives stimulating patients to actively participate in their treatment are needed.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicQuality ImprovementAdultAgedCatheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsCross InfectionFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsUrinary CatheterizationUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultCatheter-related infections/prevention and controlHumansPatients’ experienceSurveys and QuestionnairesUrinary tract infections/prevention and control

Identifiers

PMID30680418
PMCPMC6954151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.