ArticleAEM education and training2019
Evaluation of a Web-based Educational Program to Teach the Identification and Management of Alcohol Withdrawal in the Emergency Department.
Article in AEM education and training, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of an e-learning course in oxygen therapy.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a Web-based Educational Program to Teach the Identification and Management of Alcohol Withdrawal in the Emergency Department.AEM education and training · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdeal management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) incorporates a symptom-driven approach, where patients are regularly assessed using a standardized scoring system (Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised [CIWA-Ar]) and treated according to severity. Accurate administration of the CIWA-Ar requires experience, yet there is no training program to teach this competency. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a curriculum to teach clinicians how to accurately assess and treat AWS.
methodsThis was a three-phase education program consisting of a series of e-learning modules containing core competency material, an in-person seminar to orient learners to high-fidelity simulation, and a summative evaluation in an objective structured clinical examination setting using a standardized patient. To determine the impact of the AWS curriculum, we recorded how often the CIWA-Ar was appropriately applied in the emergency department (ED) before and after training. A CIWA-Ar protocol breach was defined as inappropriate administration of benzodiazepines (CIWA-Ar < 10) and failure to administer benzodiazepines when required (CIWA-Ar ≥ 10). ED length of stay, amount of benzodiazepines administered in the ED, discharge prescriptions, and unit doses (take-away bottle of four tablets) of benzodiazepine given were recorded.
resultsSeventy-four ED nurses completed the curriculum over an 8-week period. In the 5 months prior to the educational program delivery, we identified 144 of 565 (25.5%) CIWA-Ar protocol breaches, compared to 64 of 547 (11.7%) in the 5 months after training (∆13.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.3%-18.3%). Program completion resulted in a reduction in the median total dose of diazepam administered in the ED (40 mg vs. 30 mg, ∆10 mg, 95% CI = 0-20 mg) and no change was detected in ED length of stay and benzodiazepines prescribed.
conclusionsCompletion of this curriculum resulted in better compliance with the CIWA-Ar protocol by those who administer the CIWA-Ar; however, changes in inappropriate benzodiazepine prescribing practice will require future interdisciplinary initiatives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.