Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680315›Full record

ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2019

Uptake and function of membrane-destabilizing cationic nanogels for intracellular drug delivery.

William B Liechty, Rebekah L Scheuerle, Julia E Vela Ramirez, Nicholas A Peppas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Hydrogels in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William B LiechtyMcKetta Dept. of Chemical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712.
Rebekah L ScheuerleMcKetta Dept. of Chemical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712.
Julia E Vela RamirezMcKetta Dept. of Chemical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712.
Nicholas A PeppasMcKetta Dept. of Chemical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712.
The University of Texas at Austin · USAustin College · US

Funding

Sensor arrays based on molecularly imprinted polymers for diagnosis of Sjogren's syndromeR01EB022025 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ANSLYN, ERIC V., PEPPAS, NICHOLAS A · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of intracellular drug delivery vehicles demands an in-depth understanding of their internalization and function upon entering the cell to tailor the physicochemical characteristics of these platforms and achieve efficacious treatments. Polymeric cationic systems have been broadly accepted to be membrane disruptive thus being beneficial for drug delivery inside the cell. However, if excessive destabilization takes place, it can lead to adverse effects. One of the strategies used to modulate the cationic charge is the incorporation of hydrophobic moieties, thus increasing the hydrophobic content. We have demonstrated the successful synthesis of nanogels based on diethylaminoethyl methacrylate and poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate. Addition of the hydrophobic monomers

Indexed as

cationicdrug deliveryintracellularnanoparticlespolymer

Identifiers

PMID30680315
PMCPMC6336667
OpenAlexW2898157155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.