ReviewCentral European journal of urology2018
Modern urology perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers.
Review in Central European journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnostic value of miRNA-141 in prostate cancer: A systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Medium Extracellular Vesicles-A Qualitative and Quantitative Biomarker of Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Prostate Cancer Secretome and Membrane Proteome fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The Impact of Lifestyle on Prostate Cancer: A Road to the Discovery of New Biomarkers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Identification of miRNA signatures and their therapeutic potentials in prostate cancer.Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
- The Expression Patterns ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Biomarkers in the setting of benign prostatic hyperplasia-induced lower urinary tract symptoms: what an interventional radiologist needs to know.The British journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Modern biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis.Central European journal of urology · 2020Review
- Molecular analysis of circulating tumor cells of metastatic castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients receivingTheranostics · 2020Article
- Analysis of association of potentially functional genetic variants within genes encoding miR-34b/c, miR-378 and miR-143/145 with prostate cancer in Serbian population.EXCLI journal · 2019Article
- Prostate volume index and prostatic chronic inflammation have an effect on tumor load at baseline random biopsies in patients with normal DRE and PSA values less than 10 ng/ml: results of 564 consecutive cases.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProstate cancer (PCa) is the most common type of cancer among men in Europe. Current recommendations for screening and diagnosis are based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements and the digital rectal examination (DRE). Both of them are triggers for prostate biopsy. Limited specificity of the PSA test brings, however, a need to develop new, better diagnostic tools. Several commercially available variations of the PSA test including: prostate health index (PHI), 4Kscore as well as molecular PCA3 score, have already revealed its value, lowering the number of unnecessary biopsies. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis review summarizes published results of the current most promising, clinically proven and experimentally evaluated PCa biomarkers which have potential for creation of new diagnostic tests.
resultsIn the last few years new approaches for providing significantly better biomarkers, an alternative to PSA, have been introduced. Modern biomarkers show improvement in being used as not only a diagnosis procedure, but also for staging, evaluating aggressiveness and managing the therapeutic process. The most promising group are molecular markers, among them microRNAs(miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are most frequent. Their superiority, over standard PSA, in predicting tumor formation in early stages, and clinically non-symptomatic metastases has been noticed. Extracellular vesicles presence in biofluids have brought focus of many research groups, indicating their potential significance. This group of nanoparticles has potential not only in diagnostic and therapy management process, but also as a potential therapeutic target.
conclusionsFinding better PCa biomarkers, replacing the current PSA measurement, is firmly needed in modern urology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.