Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680143›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

From feces to data: A metabarcoding method for analyzing consumed and available prey in a bird-insect food web.

Seppo Rytkönen, Eero J Vesterinen, Coen Westerduin, Tiina Leviäkangas, Emma Vatka, Marko Mutanen, Panu Välimäki, Markku Hukkanen, Marko Suokas, Markku Orell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Seppo RytkönenDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.
Eero J VesterinenBiodiversity Unit University of Turku Turku Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3665-5802
Coen WesterduinDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6264-5555
Tiina LeviäkangasDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.
Emma VatkaDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2935-8295
Marko MutanenDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.
Panu VälimäkiDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.
Markku HukkanenDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.
Marko SuokasDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.
Markku OrellDepartment of Ecology and Genetics University of Oulu Oulu Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diets play a key role in understanding trophic interactions. Knowing the actual structure of food webs contributes greatly to our understanding of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. The research of prey preferences of different predators requires knowledge not only of the prey consumed, but also of what is available. In this study, we applied DNA metabarcoding to analyze the diet of 4 bird species (willow tits

Indexed as

dietary ecologyDNA barcodingfecal DNAfrassinsectivorous birdsLepidopterametagenomics

Identifiers

PMID30680143
PMCPMC6342092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.