ArticleEcology and evolution2019
Behavioral classification of low-frequency acceleration and temperature data from a free-ranging small mammal.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preprocessing Strategies for Animal Behavior Classification Using Inertial Sensors: Effects of Filtering, Normalization, and Data Representation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Refining Accelerometer-Based Animal Behaviour Classifications With Sequence-Informed Post-Processing.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Effects of Sampling Frequency on Human Activity Recognition with Machine Learning Aiming at Clinical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A benchmark for computational analysis of animal behavior, using animal-borne tags.Movement ecology · 2024Article
- Development of a multisensor biologging collar and analytical techniques to describe high-resolution spatial behavior in free-ranging terrestrial mammals.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- African dryland antelope trade-off behaviours in response to heat extremes.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Supervised versus unsupervised approaches to classification of accelerometry data.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Identification of reindeer fine-scale foraging behaviour using tri-axial accelerometer data.Movement ecology · 2022Article
- Categorising cheetah behaviour using tri-axial accelerometer data loggers: a comparison of model resolution and data logger performance.Movement ecology · 2022Article
- An implantable neurophysiology platform: Broadening research capabilities in free-living and non-traditional animals.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022Article
- Integrative Studies of the Effects of Mothers on Offspring: An Example from Wild North American Red Squirrels.Advances in neurobiology · 2022Article
- Developing a classification system to assign activity states to two species of freshwater turtles.PloS one · 2022Article
- Limitations of using surrogates for behaviour classification of accelerometer data: refining methods using random forest models in Caprids.Movement ecology · 2021Article
- Machine learning goes wild: Using data from captive individuals to infer wildlife behaviours.PloS one · 2020Article
- Behavioral classification of low-frequency acceleration and temperature data from a free-ranging small mammal.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- Feeling the heat: Elevated temperature affects male display activity of a lekking grassland bird.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The miniaturization and affordability of new technology is driving a biologging revolution in wildlife ecology with use of animal-borne data logging devices. Among many new biologging technologies, accelerometers are emerging as key tools for continuously recording animal behavior. Yet a critical, but under-acknowledged consideration in biologging is the trade-off between sampling rate and sampling duration, created by battery- (or memory-) related sampling constraints. This is especially acute among small animals, causing most researchers to sample at high rates for very limited durations. Here, we show that high accuracy in behavioral classification is achievable when pairing low-frequency acceleration recordings with temperature. We conducted 84 hr of direct behavioral observations on 67 free-ranging red squirrels (200-300 g) that were fitted with accelerometers (2 g) recording tri-axial acceleration and temperature at 1 Hz. We then used a random forest algorithm and a manually created decision tree, with variable sampling window lengths, to associate observed behavior with logger recorded acceleration and temperature. Finally, we assessed the accuracy of these different classifications using an additional 60 hr of behavioral observations, not used in the initial classification. The accuracy of the manually created decision tree classification using observational data varied from 70.6% to 91.6% depending on the complexity of the tree, with increasing accuracy as complexity decreased. Short duration behavior like running had lower accuracy than long-duration behavior like feeding. The random forest algorithm offered similarly high overall accuracy, but the manual decision tree afforded the flexibility to create a hierarchical tree, and to adjust sampling window length for behavioral states with varying durations. Low frequency biologging of acceleration and temperature allows accurate behavioral classification of small animals over multi-month sampling durations. Nevertheless, low sampling rates impose several important limitations, especially related to assessing the classification accuracy of short duration behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.