Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680142›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Behavioral classification of low-frequency acceleration and temperature data from a free-ranging small mammal.

Emily K Studd, Manuelle Landry-Cuerrier, Allyson K Menzies, Stan Boutin, Andrew G McAdam, Jeffrey E Lane, Murray M Humphries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily K StuddDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences McGill University Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue Quebec Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1883-2652
Manuelle Landry-CuerrierDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences McGill University Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue Quebec Canada.
Allyson K MenziesDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences McGill University Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue Quebec Canada.
Stan BoutinDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-038X
Andrew G McAdamDepartment of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7323-2572
Jeffrey E LaneDepartment of Biology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Murray M HumphriesDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences McGill University Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue Quebec Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The miniaturization and affordability of new technology is driving a biologging revolution in wildlife ecology with use of animal-borne data logging devices. Among many new biologging technologies, accelerometers are emerging as key tools for continuously recording animal behavior. Yet a critical, but under-acknowledged consideration in biologging is the trade-off between sampling rate and sampling duration, created by battery- (or memory-) related sampling constraints. This is especially acute among small animals, causing most researchers to sample at high rates for very limited durations. Here, we show that high accuracy in behavioral classification is achievable when pairing low-frequency acceleration recordings with temperature. We conducted 84 hr of direct behavioral observations on 67 free-ranging red squirrels (200-300 g) that were fitted with accelerometers (2 g) recording tri-axial acceleration and temperature at 1 Hz. We then used a random forest algorithm and a manually created decision tree, with variable sampling window lengths, to associate observed behavior with logger recorded acceleration and temperature. Finally, we assessed the accuracy of these different classifications using an additional 60 hr of behavioral observations, not used in the initial classification. The accuracy of the manually created decision tree classification using observational data varied from 70.6% to 91.6% depending on the complexity of the tree, with increasing accuracy as complexity decreased. Short duration behavior like running had lower accuracy than long-duration behavior like feeding. The random forest algorithm offered similarly high overall accuracy, but the manual decision tree afforded the flexibility to create a hierarchical tree, and to adjust sampling window length for behavioral states with varying durations. Low frequency biologging of acceleration and temperature allows accurate behavioral classification of small animals over multi-month sampling durations. Nevertheless, low sampling rates impose several important limitations, especially related to assessing the classification accuracy of short duration behavior.

Indexed as

accelerometerbehavioral classificationdecision treemethodsnestrandom forestred squirrel

Identifiers

PMID30680142
PMCPMC6342100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.