Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30680117›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Eoin Duffy, C Ruth Archer, Manmohan Dev Sharma, Monika Prus, Richa A Joag, Jacek Radwan, Nina Wedell, David J Hosken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. On the resolution of sexual conflict over shared traits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Ecology and evolution · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eoin DuffyInstitute of Environmental Sciences Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4150-4902
C Ruth ArcherScience and Engineering Research Support Facility (SERSF) University of Exeter Penryn UK.
Manmohan Dev SharmaScience and Engineering Research Support Facility (SERSF) University of Exeter Penryn UK.
Monika PrusInstitute of Environmental Sciences Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland.
Richa A JoagInstitute of Environmental Sciences Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland.
Jacek RadwanInstitute of Environmental Sciences Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland.
Nina WedellScience and Engineering Research Support Facility (SERSF) University of Exeter Penryn UK.
David J HoskenScience and Engineering Research Support Facility (SERSF) University of Exeter Penryn UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Males and females share most of their genome and develop many of the same traits. However, each sex frequently has different optimal values for these shared traits, creating intralocus sexual conflict. This conflict has been observed in wild and laboratory populations of insects and affects important evolutionary processes such as sexual selection, the maintenance of genetic variation, and possibly even speciation. Given the broad impacts of intralocus conflict, accurately detecting and measuring it is important. A common way to detect intralocus sexual conflict is to calculate the intersexual genetic correlation for fitness, with negative values suggesting conflict. Here, we highlight a potential confounder of this measure-cytoplasmic incompatibility caused by the intracellular parasite

Indexed as

Drosophila simulansintralocus sexual conflictsexual antagonismWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID30680117
PMCPMC6342094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.