ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Efficacies of minimally invasive puncture and small bone window craniotomy for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, evaluation of motor-evoked potentials and comparison of postoperative rehemorrhage between the two methods.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical strategies for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Surgical interventions for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy of 3D slicer-assisted minimally invasive thrombolysis combined with soft channel drainage versus craniotomy: a retrospective study in moderate basal ganglia hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the prevention of intracerebral hemorrhage among hypertensive patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting the 90-day prognosis of stereotactic brain hemorrhage patients by multiple machine learning using radiomic features combined with clinical features.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Prognostic factors in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: impact of minimally invasive puncture and drainage.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- The Application Effect of Craniotomy through Transsylvian Rolandic Point-Insular Approach on Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Posterior Basal Ganglia.Behavioural neurology · 2023Article
- A nomogram to predict the risk of postoperative intracranial rebleeding in patients with spontaneous intracranial hematoma.Neurosurgical review · 2022Article
- The effect of hematoma puncture drainage before decompressive craniectomy on the prognosis of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage with cerebral hernia at a high altitude.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2021Article
- Short-term effect and long-term prognosis of neuroendoscopic minimally invasive surgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application value of the minimally invasive puncture and small bone window craniotomy in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage was investigated to explore the effects of the above treatment methods on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and postoperative rehemorrhage. Patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage who were admitted to Chengyang People's Hospital from March 2016 to December 2017 were selected and randomly divided into the minimally invasive group (n=40) and the craniotomy group (n=40). The minimally invasive group was treated with minimally invasive puncture and drainage for hematomas, while the craniotomy group received small bone window craniotomy for evacuation of hematomas. The clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. At 28 days after operation, the Chinese scale of clinical neurological deficit of stroke patients (CSS) score in the minimally invasive group was lower than that in the craniotomy group (p<0.05). At 28 days after operation, the S-100β level in the minimally invasive group was lower than that in the craniotomy group (p<0.05). At 1 week after operation, 35 patients in the minimally invasive group were able to elicit MEP waveforms, and only 7 patients in the craniotomy group were able to elicit positive waveforms. At 2 weeks after operation, 40 patients in the minimally invasive group and 20 patients in the craniotomy group could elicit MEP waveforms, and the incubation period, central motor conduction time and amplitude in the former were significantly better than those in the latter (p<0.05). The operation time and length of hospital stay were shorter with more total expenses of hospitalization in the minimally invasive group compared to those in the craniotomy group (p<0.05). Compared with small bone window craniotomy, minimally invasive puncture can reduce serum S-100β level. Its advantages are obvious, so it is worthy of promotion and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.