Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30679983›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019

Progesterone hypersensitivity: Case report with favorable evolution.

Simona C Senila, Loredana Ungureanu, Elisabeta Candrea, Sorina Danescu, Alina Vasilovici, Rodica Cosgarea, Vlad Dionisie

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simona C SenilaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hatieganu', 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Loredana UngureanuDepartment of Dermatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hatieganu', 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Elisabeta CandreaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hatieganu', 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sorina DanescuDepartment of Dermatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hatieganu', 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alina VasiloviciDepartment of Dermatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hatieganu', 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Rodica CosgareaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hatieganu', 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Vlad DionisieDepartment of Psychiatry, Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry 'Al. Obregia', 041914 Bucharest, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progesterone hypersensitivity or autoimmune progesterone dermatitis is characterized by heterogeneous skin eruptions that cyclically aggravate during the second half of the menstrual cycle, corresponding to a rise in the progesterone level. Clinical presentation is highly variable and includes all urticaria manifestations with or without angioedema, vesiculobullous, eczematous, purpuric or target-like lesions on the skin and mucous membrane. Both endogenous progesterone as well as exogenous progestogens may represent an initial trigger. We report a case of progesterone hypersensitivity in a 27-year old woman with favorable evolution only on topical therapy, the positive clinical outcome being maintained during a subsequent pregnancy and postpartum period.

Indexed as

pregnancyprogesterone hypersensitivitytreatment

Identifiers

PMID30679983
PMCPMC6327669
OpenAlexW2903446187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.