Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30679826›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2019

The new refined minnesota risk score for acute graft-versus-host disease predicts overall survival and non-relapse mortality after T cell-replete haploidentical stem cell transplant with post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

Jacopo Mariotti, Angela Granata, Stefania Bramanti, Raynier Devillier, Sabine Furst, Barbara Sarina, Samia Harbi, Faezeh Legrand, Catherine Faucher, Pierre Jean Weiller and 5 more

Abstract readClinical TrialLetterMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sole Upfront Therapy with Beclomethasone and Budesonide for Upper Gastrointestinal Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacopo MariottiBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy. jacopo.mariotti@cancercenter.humanitas.it.ORCID 0000-0001-6528-9296
Angela GranataDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation Program, Marseille, France.
Stefania BramantiBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Raynier DevillierDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation Program, Marseille, France.
Sabine FurstDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation Program, Marseille, France.
Barbara SarinaBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Samia HarbiDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation Program, Marseille, France.
Faezeh LegrandDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation Program, Marseille, France.
Catherine FaucherDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation Program, Marseille, France.
Pierre Jean WeillerDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation Program, Marseille, France.
Christian ChabannonCell Therapy Unit, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3755-4889
Carmelo Carlo-StellaBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Armando SantoroBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Didier BlaiseDepartment of Hematology, Transplantation Program, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5684-9447
Luca CastagnaBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6239-7387
Humanitas University · ITAix-Marseille Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose to test whether the new refined Minnesota risk score, which represents a new tool for acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (aGVHD) grading, may be useful to predict the final outcome of patients with aGVHD after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy). Hundred consecutive patients with grade 2-4 aGVHD were included. Twenty-two percent of the patients had high-risk (HR) aGVHD and had a lower chance to respond at day 28: 41% of non-responders (NR) were in the HR vs 13% in the standard-risk (SR) group (p = 0.003). By multivariate analysis, grade 3-4 aGVHD according to the traditional Keystone classification was the main independent predictor of non-response to front-line treatment at day 28, while HR aGVHD by the new refined Minnesota score remained the main independent variable associated with adverse NRM and OS. The new Minnesota refined risk score is a useful tool to predict the outcome of patients with aGVHD after Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy. Due to the few patients exchanging between categories in the two classifications, it is not possible to discriminate which system better predicts the outcome of patients with aGVHD in the setting of Haplo-SCT. Extending these preliminary observations to a larger cohort is warranted.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseSeverity of Illness IndexStem Cell TransplantationAcute DiseaseAdultAllograftsCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFranceHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentCyclophosphamide

Identifiers

PMID30679826
OpenAlexW2913825543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.