Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30679725›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Comparison of regeneration capacity and Agrobacterium-mediated cell transformation efficiency of different cultivars and rootstocks of Vitis spp. via organogenesis.

S Sabbadini, L Capriotti, B Molesini, T Pandolfini, O Navacchi, C Limera, A Ricci, B Mezzetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reducing recalcitrance of black pepper toHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Efficient protocol ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Embryogenic callus induction andPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S SabbadiniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
L CapriottiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
B MolesiniDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
T PandolfiniDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
O NavacchiVitroplant International, Cesena, Italy.
C LimeraDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
A RicciDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
B MezzettiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy. b.mezzetti@staff.univpm.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9307-812X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of in vitro plant regeneration and the competence of genetic transformation greatly depends on the genotype of the species of interest. In previous work, we developed a method for the efficient Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation via organogenesis of V. vinifera cultivar Thompson Seedless, by using meristematic bulk (MB) as starting tissue. In this study, we applied this method for the regeneration and transformation of MBs obtained from the Italian cultivar Ciliegiolo and two of the commonly used Vitis rootstocks, 110 Richter and Kober 5BB, in comparison with Thompson Seedless. The A. tumefaciens strain EHA105, harbouring pK7WG2 binary vector, was used for the transformation trials, which allowed selection through the enhanced-green fluorescent protein (eGFP) and the neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII) gene. Putative transformed tissues and/or shoots were identified by either a screening based on the eGFP expression alone or its use in combination with kanamycin in the medium. MBs obtained from Thompson Seedless showed the highest regeneration and transformation cell competence, which subsequently allowed the recovery of stably transformed plants. Ciliegiolo, 110 Richter, and Kober 5BB, produced actively growing transgenic calli showing eGFP fluorescence, more consistently on selective media, but had no regenerative competence.

Indexed as

DNA Transformation CompetenceOrganogenesisRegenerationAgrobacteriumTransformation, GeneticVitis

Identifiers

PMID30679725
PMCPMC6345860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.