Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30679619›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Application of the Transcriptional Disease Signature (TDSs) to Screen Melanoma-Effective Compounds in a Small Fish Model.

Yuan Lu, William Boswell, Mikki Boswell, Barbara Klotz, Susanne Kneitz, Janine Regneri, Markita Savage, Cristina Mendoza, John Postlethwait, Wesley C Warren and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Transcriptional background effects on a tumor driver gene in different pigment cell types of medaka.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuan LuXiphophorus Genetic Stock Center, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 419 Centennial Hall, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
William BoswellXiphophorus Genetic Stock Center, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 419 Centennial Hall, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
Mikki BoswellXiphophorus Genetic Stock Center, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 419 Centennial Hall, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
Barbara KlotzDevelopmental Biochemistry, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Susanne KneitzDevelopmental Biochemistry, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Janine RegneriDevelopmental Biochemistry, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Markita SavageXiphophorus Genetic Stock Center, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 419 Centennial Hall, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
Cristina MendozaXiphophorus Genetic Stock Center, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 419 Centennial Hall, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA.
John PostlethwaitInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5476-2137
Wesley C WarrenUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Manfred SchartlDevelopmental Biochemistry, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9882-5948
Ronald B WalterXiphophorus Genetic Stock Center, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 419 Centennial Hall, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA. rwalter@txstate.edu.
Texas State University · USUniversity of Würzburg · DEUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

Enhanced Development of the Xiphophorus Model System R24-OD-011120R24OD011120 · OD · TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GABOR, CAITLIN, LU, YUAN · 2012 to 2019
$5.3M
Development of Aquatic Model Resources for Therapeutic ScreensR24OD018555 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI POSTLETHWAIT, JOHN H. · 2014 to 2017
$2.6M
Whole genome assembly resources for aquatic models of human diseaseR24OD011198 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WARREN, WESLEY CHARLES · 2012 to 2019
$1.4M
NIH HHS R24 OD011120NIH HHS R24 OD011198NIH HHS R24 OD018555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell culture and protein target-based compound screening strategies, though broadly utilized in selecting candidate compounds, often fail to eliminate candidate compounds with non-target effects and/or safety concerns until late in the drug developmental process. Phenotype screening using intact research animals is attractive because it can help identify small molecule candidate compounds that have a high probability of proceeding to clinical use. Most FDA approved, first-in-class small molecules were identified from phenotypic screening. However, phenotypic screening using rodent models is labor intensive, low-throughput, and very expensive. As a novel alternative for small molecule screening, we have been developing gene expression disease profiles, termed the Transcriptional Disease Signature (TDS), as readout of small molecule screens for therapeutic molecules. In this concept, compounds that can reverse, or otherwise affect known disease-associated gene expression patterns in whole animals may be rapidly identified for more detailed downstream direct testing of their efficacy and mode of action. To establish proof of concept for this screening strategy, we employed a transgenic strain of a small aquarium fish, medaka (Oryzias latipes), that overexpresses the malignant melanoma driver gene xmrk, a mutant egfr gene, that is driven by a pigment cell-specific mitf promoter. In this model, melanoma develops with 100% penetrance. Using the transgenic medaka malignant melanoma model, we established a screening system that employs the NanoString nCounter platform to quantify gene expression within custom sets of TDS gene targets that we had previously shown to exhibit differential transcription among xmrk-transgenic and wild-type medaka. Compound-modulated gene expression was identified using an internet-accessible custom-built data processing pipeline. The effect of a given drug on the entire TDS profile was estimated by comparing compound-modulated genes in the TDS using an activation Z-score and Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistics. TDS gene probes were designed that target common signaling pathways that include proliferation, development, toxicity, immune function, metabolism and detoxification. These pathways may be utilized to evaluate candidate compounds for potential favorable, or unfavorable, effects on melanoma-associated gene expression. Here we present the logistics of using medaka to screen compounds, as well as, the development of a user-friendly NanoString data analysis pipeline to support feasibility of this novel TDS drug-screening strategy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAntineoplastic AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticMelanomaOryziasSmall Molecule LibrariesTranscriptomeAntineoplastic AgentsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID30679619
PMCPMC6345854
OpenAlexW2916383392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.