Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30679604›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Effects of the long-term storage of human fecal microbiota samples collected in RNAlater.

Julien Tap, Stéphanie Cools-Portier, Sonia Pavan, Anne Druesne, Lena Öhman, Hans Törnblom, Magnus Simren, Muriel Derrien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Methodological considerations for aqueous environmental RNA collection, preservation, and extraction.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Stability of the Fecal and Oral Microbiome over 2 Years at -80°C for Multiple Collection Methods.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Comparison of Fecal Sample Collection Methods for Microbial Analysis Embedded within Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julien TapDanone Nutricia Research, Innovation, Science and Nutrition Department, RD 128 - Avenue de la Vauve, 91767, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8998-5413
Stéphanie Cools-PortierDanone Nutricia Research, Innovation, Science and Nutrition Department, RD 128 - Avenue de la Vauve, 91767, Palaiseau, France.
Sonia PavanSPScienceCom, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4394-7291
Anne DruesneDanone Nutricia Research, Innovation, Science and Nutrition Department, RD 128 - Avenue de la Vauve, 91767, Palaiseau, France.
Lena ÖhmanDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Inst. of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Hans TörnblomDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Inst. Of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Magnus SimrenDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Inst. Of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Muriel DerrienDanone Nutricia Research, Innovation, Science and Nutrition Department, RD 128 - Avenue de la Vauve, 91767, Palaiseau, France. muriel.derrien@danone.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8841-9153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adequate storage of fecal samples from clinical trials is crucial if analyses are to be performed later and in long-term studies. However, it is unknown whether the composition of the microbiota is preserved during long-term stool storage (>1 year). We therefore evaluated the influence of long-term storage on the microbiota composition of human stool samples collected in RNAlater and stored for approximately five years at -80 °C. We compared storage effects on stool samples from 24 subjects with the effects of technical variation due to different sequencing runs and biological variation (intra- and inter-subject), in another 101 subjects, based on alpha-diversity, beta-diversity and taxonomic composition. We also evaluated the impact of initial alpha-diversity and fecal microbiota composition on beta-diversity instability upon storage. Overall, long-term stool storage at -80 °C had only limited effects on the microbiota composition of human feces. The magnitude of changes in alpha- and beta- diversity and taxonomic composition after long-term storage was similar to inter-sequencing variation and smaller than biological variation (both intra- and inter-subject). The likelihood of fecal samples being affected by long-term storage correlated with the initial relative abundance of some genera and tend to be affected by initial taxonomic richness.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaBiodiversityFecesHumansPreservation, BiologicalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecimen HandlingTemperatureRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30679604
PMCPMC6345939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.