Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30679593›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Process calculi may reveal the equivalence lying at the heart of RNA and proteins.

Stefano Maestri, Emanuela Merelli

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefano MaestriSchool of Science and Technology, University of Camerino, Camerino, 62032, Italy.
Emanuela MerelliSchool of Science and Technology, University of Camerino, Camerino, 62032, Italy. emanuela.merelli@unicam.it.
Università di Camerino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The successful use of process calculi to specify behavioural models allows us to compare RNA and protein folding processes from a new perspective. We model the folding processes as behaviours resulting from the interactions that nucleotides and amino acids (the elementary units that compose RNAs and proteins respectively) perform on their linear sequences. This approach is intended to provide new knowledge about the studied systems without strictly relying on empirical data. By applying Milner's CCS process algebra to highlight the distinguishing features of the two folding processes, we discovered an abstraction level at which they show behavioural equivalences. We believe that this result could be interpreted as a clue in favour of the highly-debated RNA World theory, according to which, in the early stages of cell evolution, RNA molecules played most of the functional and structural roles carried out today by proteins.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularBase PairingComputational BiologyHydrogen BondingHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsNucleotidesProtein FoldingProteinsRNARNA FoldingStatic ElectricityNucleotidesProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID30679593
PMCPMC6345955
OpenAlexW2914020367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.