Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30679297›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation.

Rachel L O'Donnell, Georgios Angelopoulos, James P Beirne, Ioannis Biliatis, Helen Bolton, Melissa Bradbury, Elaine Craig, Ketan Gajjar, Michelle L Mackintosh, Wendy MacNab and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dual antibiotic prevention bundle is associated with decreased surgical site infections.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel L O'DonnellSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Georgios AngelopoulosSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
James P BeirneSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Ioannis BiliatisSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Helen BoltonSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Melissa BradburySGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Elaine CraigSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Ketan GajjarSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Michelle L MackintoshSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Wendy MacNabSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Thumuluru Kavitha MadhuriSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Mark McComiskeySGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Eva MyriokefalitakiSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Claire L NewtonSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Nithya RatnaveluSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Sian E TaylorSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Amudha ThangaveluSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Sarah A RhodesCentre for Biostatistics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Emma J CrosbieSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0284-8630
Richard J EdmondsonSGRN, Surgical Gynaecological Oncology Research Network, UK.
Yee-Loi Louise WanDivision of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1441-6050
Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBUniversity of Ulster · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBLeicester General Hospital · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBNIHR Research Delivery Network · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-CS-012-009Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 101714/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSurgical site infection (SSI) complicates 5% of all surgical procedures in the UK and is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and a substantial drain on healthcare resources. Little is known about the incidence of SSI and its consequences in women undergoing surgery for gynaecological cancer. Our aim was to perform the first national audit of SSI following gynaecological cancer surgery through the establishment of a UK-wide trainee-led research network. DESIGN AND

settingIn a prospective audit, we collected data from all women undergoing laparotomy for suspected gynaecological cancer at 12 specialist oncology centres in the UK during an 8-week period in 2015. Clinicopathological data were collected, and wound complications and their sequelae were recorded during the 30 days following surgery.

resultsIn total, 339 women underwent laparotomy for suspected gynaecological cancer during the study period. A clinical diagnosis of SSI was made in 54 (16%) women. 33% (18/54) of women with SSI had prolonged hospital stays, and 11/37 (29%) had their adjuvant treatment delayed or cancelled. Multivariate analysis found body mass index (BMI) was the strongest risk factor for SSI (OR 1.08[95% CI 1.03 to 1.14] per 1 kg/m

conclusionsSSI is common in women undergoing surgery for gynaecological cancer leading to delays in discharge and adjuvant treatment. Resultant delays in adjuvant treatment may impact cancer-specific survival rates. Modifiable factors, such as choice of wound closure material, offer opportunities for reducing SSI and reducing morbidity in these women. There is a clear need for new trials in SSI prevention in this patient group; our trainee-led initiative provides a platform for their successful completion.

Indexed as

Clinical AuditAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansIncidenceLaparotomyLength of StayLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSuctionSurgical Wound Infectiongynaecological oncologyhospital acquired infectionnoscomial infectionsurgerysurgical site infectionwound management

Identifiers

PMID30679297
PMCPMC6347877
OpenAlexW2901694591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.