Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30679260›Full record

ArticleGenetics2019

Homeologous Epistasis in Wheat: The Search for an Immortal Hybrid.

Nicholas Santantonio, Jean-Luc Jannink, Mark Sorrells

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas SantantonioCornell University, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrated Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ithaca, New York 14853 ns722@cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4351-4023
Jean-Luc JanninkCornell University, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrated Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ithaca, New York 14853.ORCID 0000-0003-4849-628X
Mark SorrellsCornell University, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrated Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ithaca, New York 14853.ORCID 0000-0002-7367-2663
New York State College of Agriculture & Life Sciences · USCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization between related species results in the formation of an allopolyploid with multiple subgenomes. These subgenomes will each contain complete, yet evolutionarily divergent, sets of genes. Like a diploid hybrid, allopolyploids will have two versions, or homeoalleles, for every gene. Partial functional redundancy between homeologous genes should result in a deviation from additivity. These epistatic interactions between homeoalleles are analogous to dominance effects, but are fixed across subgenomes through self pollination. An allopolyploid can be viewed as an immortalized hybrid, with the opportunity to select and fix favorable homeoallelic interactions within inbred varieties. We present a subfunctionalization epistasis model to estimate the degree of functional redundancy between homeoallelic loci and a statistical framework to determine their importance within a population. We provide an example using the homeologous dwarfing genes of allohexaploid wheat,

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticHybridization, GeneticHybrid VigorPlant BreedingTriticumallopolyploidyepistasisgenomic predictionheterosishomeologoussubfunctionalizationwheat

Identifiers

PMID30679260
PMCPMC6404247
OpenAlexW2913005454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.