Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30678710›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Hospital based care at home; study protocol for a mixed epidemiological and randomized controlled trial.

Ingebjørg Irgens, Jana M Hoff, Hilde Sørli, Hanne Haugland, Johan K Stanghelle, Tiina Rekand

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02800915 (Telemedicine Makes the Patient Stay in Hospital at Home. Service Innovation With Focus on Multidisciplinary Collaboration), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02800915 nacompletednot on this map

Telemedicine Makes the Patient Stay in Hospital at Home. Service Innovation With Focus on Multidisciplinary Collaboration

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnaas Rehabilitation HospitalRan2016 to 2019Enrolled56ConditionsSpinal Cord Injury, Pressure InjuryArmsService innovation with focus on multidisciplinary collaboration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ingebjørg IrgensSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyrveien 11, 1450, Nesoddtangen, Norway. Ingebjorg.irgens@sunnaas.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5506-3856
Jana M HoffDepartment of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 71, 5053, Bergen, Norway.
Hilde SørliSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyrveien 11, 1450, Nesoddtangen, Norway.
Hanne HauglandSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyrveien 11, 1450, Nesoddtangen, Norway.
Johan K StanghelleSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyrveien 11, 1450, Nesoddtangen, Norway.
Tiina RekandDepartment of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 71, 5053, Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOSunnaas sykehus · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

EkstraStiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering 2017/FO149043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) are prone to pressure ulcers (PUs) because of the loss of sensorimotor function involved as well as increased skin moisture. Treatment of PU after SCI is complicated, involving different specialties and with need for long-lasting follow-up. This study should identify risk factors for PU after SCI, and find an effective and less time-consuming treatment for the condition among different available methods for follow-up. METHOD/

designThe first part of this research project aims to investigate the prevalence of PU among persons with SCI based on an epidemiological design. The study will identify possible risk factors for acquiring PU. A questionnaire focusing on previous and present PUs will be sent to persons who suffered SCIs between January 2004 and January 2014. In the second part we will compare two different treatment regimens of PU through a randomized controlled pilot trial (RCT) where we will compare outpatient SCI follow-up in a hospital versus outpatient follow-up from the patient's home, using telemedicine (teleSCI) interventions. We will compare the healing of the PU in the two groups (usual care versus teleSCI). The Tissue, Infection, Moisture Edge (TIME) registration form, the Photographic Wound Assessment Tool (PWAT) and the change in the ulcer size will be used to monitor the healing. Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the need for assistance will be assessed using the Five Dimensions European Quality of Life scale (EQ-5D), the generic Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) modified version, the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Data set (ISCI-QoL Data set), and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure scale, version III (SCIM III). In addition to primary outcome measures, a cost-benefit evaluation and an assessment of patient satisfaction and participation will be performed, using customized questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The first part of the research project will reveal the epidemiology of PU after SCI, and explore the risk factors. This part enables further prevention of PU after SCI and this information will be used in the follow-up RCT. Videoconferencing in the outpatient follow-up of persons with SCI and PU will change clinical routines and facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration, communication and competence exchange among participants of the health care services. Our research protocol allows comparing methods for interaction between medical specialists at hospitals, local caregivers in the community, next of kin, and persons with SCI and PU. The RCT should identify advantages as well as challenges in the management of PU in different follow-up settings. This study aims to identify risk factors for PU after SCI, and find an effective and less time consuming treatment for the condition among different available methods for follow- up.

trial registration1. www.ClinicalTrials.gov , ID: NCT02800915 , last update 9 October 2017. 2. The National Regional Ethical Committee (REC) 2014/ 684/ REK-Nord. https://helseforskning.etikkom.no/prosjekterirek/prosjektregister/prosjekt?p_document_id=469163&p_parent_id=473640&_ikbLanguageCode=n 3. https://app.cristin.no/projects/show.jsf?id=545284 4. https://www.sunnaas.no/kliniske-studier/bruk-av-telemedisin-som-virkemiddel-til-samhandling-i-poliklinisk-oppfolging-av-pasienter-med-ryggmargsskade-og-trykksar.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesTelemedicineData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePressure UlcerQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignRisk FactorsSpinal Cord InjuriesWound HealingInterdisciplinary collaborationParaplegiaPressure ulcerPressure woundsService innovationSpinal cord injuryTelemedicineTeleSCITetraplegiaVideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID30678710
PMCPMC6346520
OpenAlexW2947103385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.