Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30678645›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Consecutive antibiotic use in the outpatient setting: an extensive, longitudinal descriptive analysis of antibiotic dispensing data in the Netherlands.

Loek A W de Jong, Paul D van der Linden, Monique M B Roukens, Ewoudt M W van de Garde, Alike W van der Velden, Stephanie Natsch, SWAB’s Working Group on Surveillance of Antimicrobial Use

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nitrofurantoin failure in males with an uncomplicated urinary tract infection: a primary care observational cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Decline in Outpatient Antibiotic Use.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Loek A W de JongDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Loek.dejong@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-8386
Paul D van der LindenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Tergooi Hospital, van Riebeeckweg 212, 1213 XZ, Hilversum, Netherlands.
Monique M B RoukensDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ewoudt M W van de GardeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Science, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Alike W van der VeldenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (STR 6.103), Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Stephanie NatschDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
SWAB’s Working Group on Surveillance of Antimicrobial Use

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTaking consecutive antibiotic use into account is of importance to obtain insight in treatment within disease episodes, use of 2nd- and 3rd-choice antibiotics, therapy failure and/or side effects. Nevertheless, studies dealing with consecutive antibiotic use are scarce. We aimed at evaluating switch patterns in antibiotic use in the outpatient setting in the Netherlands.

methodsOutpatient antibiotic dispensing data was processed to antibiotic treatment episodes consisting of single prescriptions or consecutive prescriptions (2006 to 2014). Consecutive prescriptions were categorised into prolongations and switches. Switches were further analysed to obtain antibiotic switch percentages and trends over time. Outcomes were compared with recommendations of Dutch guidelines.

resultsA total of 43,179,867 antibiotic prescriptions were included in the analysis, consisting of single prescriptions (95%), prolongations (2%) and switches (3%). The highest switch percentages were found for trimethoprim (7.6%) and nitrofurantoin (5.4%). For fosfomycin, ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin and trimethoprim we found the highest yearly increase in switching. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was most often used as second antibiotic in a switch. A surprisingly high number of 2nd- and 3rd-choice antibiotics are prescribed as first antibiotic in a treatment.

conclusionsAlthough the actual reason for a switch is unknown, switch patterns can reveal problems concerning treatment failure and guideline adherence. In general, switch percentages of antibiotics in the Netherlands are low. The data contributes to the knowledge regarding antibiotic switch patterns in the outpatient setting.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsDrug PrescriptionsHumansLongitudinal StudiesNetherlandsOutpatientsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibacterialsAntibiotic failureAntibiotic prescriptionAntibioticsAntibiotic usageConsecutive antibiotic useOutpatient settingSwitchTreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID30678645
PMCPMC6346528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.