Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30678280›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

A Low-Cost Indoor Activity Monitoring System for Detecting Frailty in Older Adults.

Thomas Tegou, Ilias Kalamaras, Markos Tsipouras, Nikolaos Giannakeas, Kostantinos Votis, Dimitrios Tzovaras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas TegouInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece. thomtego@iti.gr.
Ilias KalamarasInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece. kalamar@iti.gr.
Markos TsipourasInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece. tsipouras@iti.gr.ORCID 0000-0002-6757-1698
Nikolaos GiannakeasInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece. giannakeas@iti.gr.
Kostantinos VotisInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece. kvotis@iti.gr.ORCID 0000-0001-6381-8326
Dimitrios TzovarasInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki 57001, Greece. dimitrios.tzovaras@iti.gr.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 690140Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 732679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor localization systems have already wide applications mainly for providing localized information and directions. The majority of them focus on commercial applications providing information such us advertisements, guidance and asset tracking. Medical oriented localization systems are uncommon. Given the fact that an individual's indoor movements can be indicative of his/her clinical status, in this paper we present a low-cost indoor localization system with room-level accuracy used to assess the frailty of older people. We focused on designing a system with easy installation and low cost to be used by non technical staff. The system was installed in older people houses in order to collect data about their indoor localization habits. The collected data were examined in combination with their frailty status, showing a correlation between them. The indoor localization system is based on the processing of Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) measurements by a tracking device, from Bluetooth Beacons, using a fingerprint-based procedure. The system has been tested in realistic settings achieving accuracy above 93% in room estimation. The proposed system was used in 271 houses collecting data for 1⁻7-day sessions. The evaluation of the collected data using ten-fold cross-validation showed an accuracy of 83% in the classification of a monitored person regarding his/her frailty status (Frail, Pre-frail, Non-frail).

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overData CollectionEquipment DesignFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryMovementReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareWireless TechnologyBluetooth beaconsfrailty level assessmentindoor localizationroom-level accuracy

Identifiers

PMID30678280
PMCPMC6387201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.