Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30678103›Full record

ArticleMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Integrated FISH, Karyotyping and aCGH Analyses for Effective Prenatal Diagnosis of Common Aneuploidies and Other Cytogenomic Abnormalities.

Hongyan Chai, Autumn DiAdamo, Brittany Grommisch, Jennifer Boyle, Katherine Amato, Dongmei Wang, Jiadi Wen, Peining Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongyan ChaiLaboratory of Clinical Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. hongyan.chai@yale.edu.
Autumn DiAdamoLaboratory of Clinical Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. autumn.diadamo@yale.edu.
Brittany GrommischLaboratory of Clinical Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. brittany.grommisch@yale.edu.
Jennifer BoyleLaboratory of Clinical Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. jennifer.boyle@yale.edu.
Katherine AmatoLaboratory of Clinical Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. Katherine.wilcox@yale.edu.
Dongmei WangLaboratory of Clinical Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. dongmei.wang@yale.edu.
Jiadi WenLaboratory of Clinical Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. jiadi.wen@yale.edu.
Peining LiLaboratory of Clinical Cytogenetics, Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. peining.li@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current prenatal genetic evaluation showed a significantly increase in non-invasive screening and the reduction of invasive diagnostic procedures. To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy on detecting common aneuploidies, structural chromosomal rearrangements, and pathogenic copy number variants (pCNV), we performed a retrospective analysis on a case series initially analyzed by aneuvysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and karyotyping then followed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Of the 386 cases retrieved from the past decade, common aneuploidies were detected in 137 cases (35.5%), other chromosomal structural rearrangements were detected in four cases (1%), and pCNV were detected in five cases (1.3%). The relative frequencies for common aneuploidies suggested an under detection of sex chromosome aneuploidies. Approximately 9.5% of cases with common aneuploidies showed a mosaic pattern. Inconsistent results between FISH and karyotyping were noted in cases with pseudo-mosaicism introduced by culture artifact or variable cellular proliferation from cells with mosaic karyotypic complements under in vitro cell culture. Based on findings from this case series, cell-based FISH and karyotyping should be performed to detect common aneuploidies, structural chromosomal abnormalities, and mosaic pattern. DNA-based aCGH and reflex FISH should be performed to detect and confirm genomic imbalances and pCNV. Practice points to ensure the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy were summarized.

Indexed as

amniotic fluid (AF)aneuploidiesarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH)chorionic villus sampling (CVS)confined placental mosaicism (CPM)fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)karyotypepathogenic copy number variants (pCNV)pseudo-mosaicismtrue fetal mosaicism (TFM)

Identifiers

PMID30678103
PMCPMC6410168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.