Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30678059›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Antigenic Targets for the Immunotherapy of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.

Ghazala Naz Khan, Kim Orchard, Barbara-Ann Guinn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Increasing Role of Targeted Immunotherapies in the Treatment of AML.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Ferroptosis in Cancer Progression: Role of Noncoding RNAs.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ghazala Naz KhanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU7 6RX, UK. G.Khan@hull.ac.uk.
Kim OrchardDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. kho@soton.ac.uk.
Barbara-Ann GuinnDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU7 6RX, UK. B.Guinn@hull.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0639-4541

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most promising approaches to preventing relapse is the stimulation of the body's own immune system to kill residual cancer cells after conventional therapy has destroyed the bulk of the tumour. In acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), the high frequency with which patients achieve first remission, and the diffuse nature of the disease throughout the periphery, makes immunotherapy particularly appealing following induction and consolidation therapy, using chemotherapy, and where possible stem cell transplantation. Immunotherapy could be used to remove residual disease, including leukaemic stem cells from the farthest recesses of the body, reducing, if not eliminating, the prospect of relapse. The identification of novel antigens that exist at disease presentation and can act as targets for immunotherapy have also proved useful in helping us to gain a better understand of the biology that belies AML. It appears that there is an additional function of leukaemia associated antigens as biomarkers of disease state and survival. Here, we discuss these findings.

Indexed as

Acute myeloid leukaemiacancer-testis antigenclinical trialhumanimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30678059
PMCPMC6406328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.