ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Can the Efficacy of [
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Boron-10 carriers and their applications in boron neutron capture therapy.Precision radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Radiolabelled Cyclodextrins for the Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Breast Cancer: Preclinical Perspectives.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Enhancing bevacizumab efficacy in a colorectal tumor mice model using dextran-coated albumin nanoparticles.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Article
- Advances in PET/CT Imaging for Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Recent Development of Radiofluorination of Boron Agents for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy of Tumor: Creation ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Skin Cancer Pathobiology at a Glance: A Focus on Imaging Techniques and Their Potential for Improved Diagnosis and Surveillance in Clinical Cohorts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
- Review
- Development of Novel Analogs of the Monocarboxylate Transporter Ligand FACH and Biological Validation of One Potential Radiotracer for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Preclinical Incorporation Dosimetry of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Special Issue "Anticancer Drugs".Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a functional imaging modality widely used in clinical oncology. Over the years the sensitivity and specificity of PET has improved with the advent of specific radiotracers, increased technical accuracy of PET scanners and incremental experience of Radiologists. However, significant limitations exist-most notably false positives and false negatives. Additionally, the accuracy of PET varies between cancer types and in some cancers, is no longer considered a standard imaging modality. This review considers the relative influence of macroscopic tumour features such as size and morphology on 2-Deoxy-2-[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.