Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30677627›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2019

Mechanisms of behavior change in motivational interviewing: do we understand how MI works?

Molly Magill, Kevin A Hallgren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Differential mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing versus health education for smoking cessation induction.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Trial
  6. Examining the Effects of a Brief, Group-Based Motivational Implementation Strategy on Mechanisms of Teacher Behavior Change.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Molly MagillBrown University, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Providence, RI 02912, United States. Electronic address: molly_magill@brown.edu.
Kevin A HallgrenUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.

Funding

Intervention Ingredients and Mechanisms of an Efficacious Motivational InterviewR01AA023194 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MAGILL, MOLLY · 2014 to 2016
$957k
Developing a tool to assess, provide feedback, and facilitate discussion of mechanisms of change in frontline addiction treatmentK01AA024796 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HALLGREN, KEVIN A. · 2016 to 2020
$870k
Technical, Relational, & Conditional Process Models of MI Efficacy: Meta-AnalysisR21AA023662 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MAGILL, MOLLY · 2015 to 2016
$423k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA024796NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023194NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA023662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work provides an overview of Motivational Interviewing (MI) theory, the nature of the evidence for its mechanisms of action, and considers future directions. There are three hypotheses purported to explain how MI works: The Technical Hypothesis, the Relational Hypothesis, and the Conflict Resolution Hypothesis. In contrast to the latter two hypotheses, the Technical Hypothesis has received the most empirical attention in the MI process literature. Research shows that clinician technical skills in MI are well-defined, they relate to the intended client mechanisms (i.e. change talk and sustain talk), but the evidence supporting client mechanisms as predictors of subsequent changes to behavior is less conclusive. Future research and clinical implications are briefly considered.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychological TheoryHealth BehaviorHumansNegotiating

Identifiers

PMID30677627
PMCPMC6581630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.