Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30677394›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2019

New insights on the cardiac safety factor: Unraveling the relationship between conduction velocity and robustness of propagation.

Patrick M Boyle, William H Franceschi, Marion Constantin, Claudia Hawks, Thomas Desplantez, Natalia A Trayanova, Edward J Vigmond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Guidelines for assessment of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias in small animals.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Electrophysiological Substrate in Patients with Barlow's Disease.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Mechanisms of Arrhythmias in the Brugada Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick M BoyleDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: pmjboyle@uw.edu.
William H FranceschiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marion ConstantinIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac-Bordeaux, France.
Claudia HawksDepartment of Physics and Applied Mathematics at the University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Thomas DesplantezIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac-Bordeaux, France; INSERM, Centre de recherche Cardio-Thoracique de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Natalia A TrayanovaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Edward J VigmondIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Pessac-Bordeaux, France; Université de Bordeaux, Talence, France. Electronic address: edward.vigmond@u-bordeaux.fr.

Funding

Virtual Electrophysiology LaboratoryDP1HL123271 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYANOVA, NATALIA A. · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
Infarct-related Ventricular Tachycardia Mechanisms: From Micro to ClinicalR01HL142496 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYANOVA, NATALIA A. · 2019 to 2022
$3.1M
Exploration of Arrhythmogenic Triggers and Substrates in Heart FailureR01HL126802 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EFIMOV, IGOR R, GORELIK, JULIA · 2016 to 2019
$2.8M
ANCILLARY STUDY OF SUBSTRATE AND INTERVENTION MECHANISMS FOR MALIGNANT ARRHYTHMIAR01HL116280 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI NAZARIAN, SAMAN · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 16SDG30440006NHLBI NIH HHS DP1 HL123271NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116280NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126802NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac conduction disturbances are linked with arrhythmia development. The concept of safety factor (SF) has been derived to describe the robustness of conduction, but the usefulness of this metric has been constrained by several limitations. For example, due to the difficulty of measuring the necessary input variables, SF calculations have only been applied to synthetic data. Moreover, quantitative validation of SF is lacking; specifically, the practical meaning of particular SF values is unclear, aside from the fact that propagation failure (i.e., conduction block) is characterized by SF < 1. This study aims to resolve these limitations for our previously published SF formulation and explore its relationship to relevant electrophysiological properties of cardiac tissue. First, HL-1 cardiomyocyte monolayers were grown on multi-electrode arrays and the robustness of propagation was estimated using extracellular potential recordings. SF values reconstructed purely from experimental data were largely between 1 and 5 (up to 89.1% of sites characterized). This range is consistent with values derived from synthetic data, proving that the formulation is sound and its applicability is not limited to analysis of computational models. Second, for simulations conducted in 1-, 2-, and 3-dimensional tissue blocks, we calculated true SF values at locations surrounding the site of current injection for sub- and supra-threshold stimuli and found that they differed from values estimated by our SF formulation by <10%. Finally, we examined SF dynamics under conditions relevant to arrhythmia development in order to provide physiological insight. Our analysis shows that reduced conduction velocity (Θ) caused by impaired intrinsic cell-scale excitability (e.g., due to sodium current a loss-of-function mutation) is associated with less robust conduction (i.e., lower SF); however, intriguingly, Θ variability resulting from modulation of tissue scale conductivity has no effect on SF. These findings are supported by analytic derivation of the relevant relationships from first principles. We conclude that our SF formulation, which can be applied to both experimental and synthetic data, produces values that vary linearly with the excess charge needed for propagation. SF calculations can provide insights helpful in understanding the initiation and perpetuation of cardiac arrhythmia.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaModels, CardiovascularAction PotentialsAnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacHeart BlockHeart RateHumansMyocardial ContractionMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacThermal ConductivityCardiac electrophysiologyCardiac excitabilityCardiac safety factorConduction velocityFibrosisSodium channelSource-sink mismatch

Identifiers

PMID30677394
PMCPMC6474757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.