Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30676837›Full record

ArticleJournal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics2019

Retrospective Medical Record Review to Describe Use of Repository Corticotropin Injection Among Patients with Uveitis in the United States.

Winnie W Nelson, Antonio Flavio Lima, John Kranyak, Barima Opong-Owusu, Gosia Ciepielewska, Jack R Gallagher, Kylee Heap, Susan Carroll

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ActharClinical drug investigation · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Winnie W Nelson1 Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bedminster, New Jersey.
Antonio Flavio Lima1 Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bedminster, New Jersey.
John Kranyak1 Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bedminster, New Jersey.
Barima Opong-Owusu1 Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bedminster, New Jersey.
Gosia Ciepielewska1 Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bedminster, New Jersey.
Jack R Gallagher2 Clarity Pharma Research, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina.
Kylee Heap2 Clarity Pharma Research, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina.
Susan Carroll2 Clarity Pharma Research, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina.
Mallinckrodt (United States) · USUniversity of South Carolina Upstate · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRepository corticotropin injection (RCI) has immune-modulatory and anti-inflammatory effects and is approved for multiple indications, including severe and acute chronic allergic and inflammatory processes involving the eye and adnexa. This study describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and physicians' assessments of patients with uveitis treated with RCI.

methodsThis was a retrospective medical record review of US patients. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of uveitis, received RCI in the past 12 months, and had completed or were receiving RCI treatment at the time of data collection. Baseline characteristics and after-treatment clinical data are descriptively reported.

resultsThe study included 91 patients (mean age 41 years, 62% female, and mean time since diagnosis 3.98 years). Most patients had moderate (n = 48, 53%) to severe (n = 21, 23%) visual impairment, and none was blind before RCI therapy. Patients used an average of 2.5 medications before RCI. Initial RCI dosing regimens, dose adjustments, and treatment durations were different for each patient. Concomitant medication use and dosages were reduced during RCI; 76 patients (84%) improved, 15 patients (16%) stayed the same, and none worsened; 86% of patients had improvements in vision.

conclusionsPhysicians individualized RCI therapy among patients who suffered uveitis for several years and when previous therapies were inadequate. Most patients improved after initiating RCI, most commonly in vision. The findings support use of RCI for uveitis and provide a better understanding of patient characteristics and practice patterns to guide appropriate use.

Indexed as

Medical RecordsAdministration, TopicalAdolescentAdrenocorticotropic HormoneAdultAgedChildDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInflammationInjections, IntraocularMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAdrenocorticotropic HormoneACTHdrug therapyhealth care utilizationRCIrepository corticotropin injectionuveitis

Identifiers

PMID30676837
PMCPMC6479238
OpenAlexW2914349717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.