Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30676629›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2019

Assessment of Neurocognitive Impairment and Speech Functioning Before Head and Neck Cancer Treatment.

Vitória Piai, Judith B Prins, Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw, C René Leemans, Chris H J Terhaard, Johannes A Langendijk, Robert J Baatenburg de Jong, Johannes H Smit, Robert P Takes, Roy P C Kessels

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vitória PiaiRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Centre for Medical Neuroscience, Department of Medical Psychology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Judith B PrinsRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Irma M Verdonck-de LeeuwAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C René LeemansAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Chris H J TerhaardVrije Universiteit, Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Johannes A LangendijkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Robert J Baatenburg de JongDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Johannes H SmitAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Robert P TakesRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Roy P C KesselsRadboud University Medical Center, Donders Centre for Medical Neuroscience, Department of Medical Psychology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its treatment may negatively alter neurocognitive and speech functioning. However, the prevalence of neurocognitive impairment among patients with HNC before treatment is poorly studied, and the association between neurocognitive and speech functioning is unknown, which hampers good interpretability of the effect of HNC treatment on neurocognitive and speech function. Objectives: To document neurocognitive functioning in patients with HNC before treatment and to investigate the association between neurocognitive and speech functioning. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cohort study of newly diagnosed patients with HNC before treatment using a large sample obtained in a nationwide, multicenter setting (Netherlands Quality of Life and Biomedical Cohort Study in Head and Neck Cancer [NET-QUBIC] project). Main Outcome and Measures: Objective neuropsychological measures of delayed recall, letter fluency, and executive functioning, as well as patient-reported outcome measures on neurocognitive speech and functioning, were collected before treatment. Results: In total, 254 patients with HNC participated (71.7% male), with a mean (SD) age of 62 (10) years. The response rate ranged from 81.9% (208 of 254) to 84.6% (215 of 254). Objective neurocognitive measures indicated that 4.7% (10 of 212) to 15.0% (32 of 214) of patients were initially seen with moderate to severe cognitive impairment. Mild to moderate impairment was found in 12.3% (26 of 212) to 26.2% (56 of 214) of patients. The most altered domains were delayed recall and letter fluency. Seven percent (15 of 208) of the patients reported high levels of everyday neurocognitive failure, and 42.6% (89 of 209) reported speech problems. Objective neurocognitive function was not significantly associated with patient-reported neurocognitive or speech functioning, but the results from patient-reported outcome measures were significantly correlated. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study demonstrate a high prevalence of impaired speech functioning among patients with HNC before treatment, which is in line with previous findings. A novel finding is that neurocognitive impairment is also highly prevalent as objectively measured and as self-perceived. Understanding the reason why patients with HNC are initially seen with neurocognitive impairment before the start of treatment is important because this impairment may complicate patient-clinician interaction and alter treatment adherence and because treatment itself may further worsen cognitive functioning. In addition, low self-perceived neurocognitive and speech functioning before treatment may decrease a patient's confidence in communicative participation and perceived quality of life. Disentangling the associations between objective and patient-reported neurocognitive and speech functions is an important area for future research.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNeurocognitive DisordersNeuropsychological TestsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPrevalenceQuality of LifeSpeech Disorders

Identifiers

PMID30676629
PMCPMC6439757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.