Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30676310›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical microbiology2019

The effects of iclaprim on exotoxin production in methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

Amy E Bryant, Sumiko Gomi, Eva Katahira, David B Huang, Dennis L Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evaluation ofAccess microbiology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy E Bryant1 University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sumiko Gomi2 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA.
Eva Katahira2 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA.
David B Huang3 Motif BioSciences, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Dennis L Stevens1 University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USMotif BioSciences (United States) · US

Funding

The role of the innate immune response in adenovirus Ad14p1 immunopathogenesisP20GM109007 · NIGMS · IDAHO VETERANS RESEARCH / EDUCATION FDN · PI STEVENS, DENNIS L · 2016 to 2021
$10.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExtracellular protein toxins contribute to the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infections. The present study compared the effects of iclaprim and trimethoprim - two folic acid synthesis inhibitors - with nafcillin and vancomycin on production of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), alpha haemolysin (AH) and toxic-shock syndrome toxin I (TSST-1) in methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (MRSA and VISA, respectively). METHODOLOGY: Northern blotting and RT-PCR were used to assess gene transcription; toxin-specific bioassays were used to measure protein toxin production.

resultsAs shown previously, sub-inhibitory concentrations (sub-MIC) of nafcillin increased and prolonged MRSA toxin gene transcription and enhanced PVL, TSST-1 and AH production. Sub-inhibitory doses of iclaprim and trimethoprim delayed maximal AH gene (hla) transcription and suppressed AH production; both drugs delayed, but neither reduced, maximal TSST-1 production. Trimethoprim significantly increased lukF-PV expression and PVL production compared to both untreated and iclaprim-treated cultures. Higher concentrations of iclaprim and trimethoprim markedly suppressed MRSA growth, mRNA synthesis and toxin production. In VISA, iclaprim, vancomycin and nafcillin variably increased tst and hla expression, but only nafcillin increased toxin production. Despite its ability to increase hla expression, iclaprim was the most potent inhibitor of AH production.

conclusionsWe conclude that, due to its ability to suppress toxin production, iclaprim should be effective against severe staphylococcal infections caused by toxin-producing MRSA and VISA strains, especially given its ability to concentrate at sites of infection such as skin and skin structures and the lung.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ToxinsBiological AssayExotoxinsFolic Acid AntagonistsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPyrimidinesStaphylococcus aureusTrimethoprimVancomycinVirulence FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ToxinsExotoxinsFolic Acid AntagonistsiclaprimPyrimidinesTrimethoprimVancomycinVirulence Factorsalpha haemolysinIclaprimMRSAPanton–Valentine leukocidinStaphylococcus aureusTSST-1VISA

Identifiers

PMID30676310
PMCPMC6580997
OpenAlexW2914392887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.