ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2019
Identification of vascular lumen by singular value decomposition filtering on blood flow velocity distribution.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modified high-resolution wavenumber analysis for detection of pulse wave velocity using coefficient of variation of arterial wall acceleration waveforms.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn the present study, we proposed a novel method for identification of the vascular lumen by employing singular value decomposition (SVD), and the feasibility of the proposed method was validated by in vivo measurement of the common carotid artery.
methodSVD filtering was applied to a velocity map that was estimated using an autocorrelation method to identify the lumen region. In this study, the packet size was set at 999 frames with a frame rate of 1302 Hz. The region estimated by the proposed SVD filtering was compared with that estimated by the conventional power Doppler method.
resultThe averaged differences in feature values between vascular wall and lumen regions obtained by the proposed and conventional methods were 34 dB and 26 dB, respectively. The proposed method was hardly influenced by the cardiac phase and could separate the wall and lumen regions more stably. The proposed method could identify the lumen region by setting a threshold of - 28 dB from the averaged difference amplitude.
conclusionWe proposed a novel method for identification of the vascular lumen. The proposed method could suppress the effects of wall motion, which was present in the conventional power Doppler image. The lumen region identified by the proposed method well conformed with the anatomical information in the B-mode image of the corresponding section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30675677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.