Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30675670›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2019

Genetic analysis of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato ticks, parasites of dogs in the Canary Islands, Cyprus, and Croatia, based on mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene sequences.

Lidia Chitimia-Dobler, Lina Kurzrock, Tomáš Molčányi, Ramona Rieß, Ute Mackenstedt, Santiago Nava

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lidia Chitimia-DoblerBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937, Munich, Germany. lydiachitimia@gmail.com.
Lina KurzrockUniversity of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Tomáš MolčányiSurgeon General Office, Armed Forces of Slovak Republic, Gen. M. Vesela 23, Ružomberok, Slovakia.
Ramona RießBundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937, Munich, Germany.
Ute MackenstedtUniversity of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Santiago NavaInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CC 22, CP 2300, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to perform an analysis based on mtDNA sequences of the 16S rRNA gene in order to determine the phylogenetic position of ticks belonging to the Rhipicephalus sanguineus group from the Canary Islands, Cyprus, and Croatia. All the haplotypes obtained from ticks collected in the Canary Islands and Croatia grouped with R. sanguineus sensu stricto from France, Portugal, Italy, Switzerland, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, and the USA. The sequences of R. sanguineus sensu lato from Cyprus formed a clade with R. sanguineus s.l. from Egypt, Turkey, and Romania, which belongs to the "Rhipicephalus sp. morphotype I" or "southeastern European lineage." Ticks determined as R. turanicus s.l. from Cyprus clustered separately from the remaining clades of the R. sanguineus group, including R. turanicus s.s. The data show that R. sanguineus s.s. is present in the Canary Islands and Croatia, while R. sanguineus "southeastern lineage" is found in Cyprus.

Indexed as

AnimalsCroatiaCyprusDNA, MitochondrialDog DiseasesDogsPhylogenyRhipicephalus sanguineusRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpainTick InfestationsDNA, MitochondrialRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCanary IslandsCroatiaCyprusGenetic analysesRhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.