ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2019
Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Melanoma in Japan.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.
- What are the applications of single-cell RNA sequencing in cancer research: a systematic review.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Pooled it
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Acral Melanoma: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma: 3-year survival update and multi-omics analysis.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Trial
- Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Mucosal Melanoma: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Phase II Study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Trial
- Final analysis of a phase II study of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab for unresectable chemotherapy-naive advanced melanoma.The Journal of dermatology · 2020Trial
- Seen on screen, missed in clinic: educational pearls fromSkin health and disease · 2026Review
- Microneedle-based theranostics for melanoma: Advances and outlook.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- GSH-Responsive PBAE Polymers for IL-12 mRNA Delivery in Melanoma Immunotherapy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- A deep learning-clinical nomogram hybrid for predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Article
- Interferon-Based Therapeutics in Cancer Therapy: Past, Present, and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pathway-Specific Therapeutic Modulation of Melanoma: Small-Molecule Inhibition of BRAF-MEK and KIT Signaling in Contemporary Precision Oncology with a Special Focus on Vemurafenib, Trametinib, and Imatinib.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Oncogenic B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase-mediated hedgehog signalling in the pathogenesis and targeted therapy of melanoma.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Diabetes Mellitus-A Brief Review and Three Case Reports.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- TRIM3 suppressed the tumorigenicity of melanoma cells by ubiquitinating YAP1.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- How to predict early mortality in patients with metastatic melanoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Immunotherapy for Melanoma: Perspectives on the Development of Novel Treatments: A Mini Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Chelidonine inhibits melanoma cell malignancy by inactivating TLR4/NF-κB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2025Article
- Genomic profiles of patients with skin melanoma in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Post-marketing surveillance of encorafenib in combination with binimetinib in Japanese patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- A Review of Melanoma Subtypes: Genetic and Treatment Considerations.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementMelanoma has several clinically and pathologically distinguishable subtypes, which also differ genetically. Mutation patterns vary among different melanoma subtypes, and efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors differs depending on the subtype of melanoma. In spite of the recent revolution of systemic therapies for advanced melanoma, access to innovative agents is still restricted in many countries. This review article aimed to describe the epidemiology and current status of systemic therapies for melanoma in Japan, where melanoma is rare, but access to innovative agents is available. Acral and mucosal melanomas, which are common in Asian populations, predominantly occur in sun-protected areas and share several biological features. Both the melanomas harbor KIT mutation in approximately 15% of the cases; BRAF or NRAS mutation is found in approximately 10-15% of acral melanoma, but these mutations are less frequent in mucosal melanoma. Combined use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors is one of the standards of care for patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma. In patients with melanoma harboring KIT mutation in exon 11 or 13, KIT inhibitors can be a treatment option; however, none of them have been approved in Japan. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are expected to be less effective against acral and mucosal melanomas because their somatic mutation burden is lower than those in non-acral cutaneous melanomas. A recently completed phase II trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy in 30 Japanese patients with melanoma, including seven with acral and 12 with mucosal melanoma, demonstrated an objective response rate of 43%. Regarding oncolytic viruses, canerpaturev (C-REV, also known as HF10) and talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) are currently under review in early phase trials. In the adjuvant setting, dabrafenib plus trametinb combination, nivolumab monotherapy, and pembrolizumab monotherapy were approved in July, August, and December 2018 in Japan, respectively. However, most of the adjuvant phase III trials excluded patients with mucosal melanoma. A phase III trial of adjuvant therapy with locoregional interferon (IFN)-β versus surgery alone is ongoing in Japan (JCOG1309, J-FERON), in which IFN-β is injected directly into the site of the primary tumor postoperatively, so that it would be drained through the untreated lymphatic route to the regional node basin. After the recent approval of these new agents, the JCOG1309 trial will be revised to focus on patients with stage II disease. In conclusion, acral and mucosal melanomas have been treated based on the available medical evidence for the treatment of non-acral cutaneous melanomas. Considering the differences in genetic backgrounds and therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy, specialized therapeutic strategies for these subtypes of melanoma should be established in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.