ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2019
New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Final results of a phase 2 clinical trial of LCL161, an oral SMAC mimetic for patients with myelofibrosis.Blood advances · 2021Trial
- Malignant JAK-signaling: at the interface of inflammation and malignant transformation.Leukemia · 2025Review
- Spatial-transcriptomic profiling: a new lens for understanding myelofibrosis pathophysiology.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
- GLI1 activates pro-fibrotic pathways in myelofibrosis fibrocytes.Cell death & disease · 2022Article
- Acquired JAK2 mutations confer resistance to JAK inhibitors in cell models of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.NPJ precision oncology · 2021Article
- Neutral effect of Glioma-associated oncogene-1 expression on survival in myelofibrosis.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2020Article
- Rapid Emergence of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia During JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy in a Patient With Myelofibrosis.HemaSphere · 2020Article
- Ruxolitinib-based combinations in the treatment of myelofibrosis: worth looking forward to.Annals of hematology · 2020Review
- The relationship between serum ferritin level and fibrosis and splenomegaly in myelofibrosis.American journal of blood research · 2020Article
- The Rationale for Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2019Review
- MF management.HemaSphere · 2019Article
- Beyond Ruxolitinib: Fedratinib and Other Emergent Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis.Cancer management and research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
opinion statementSeven years after the approval of the Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) inhibitor ruxolitinib, it remains the only drug licensed for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Patients who discontinue ruxolitinib have a dismal outcome, and this is, therefore, an area of significant unmet need. Given the central role that JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) activation plays in disease pathogenesis, there have been many other JAK inhibitors tested, but most have been abandoned, for a variety of reasons. The JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib has recently been resurrected, and there has been a resurgence of interest in the failed JAK1/2 inhibitor momelotinib, which possibly improves anemia. Pacritinib, a non-myelosuppressive JAK2-selective inhibitor, is currently in a dose-ranging study mandated by regulatory authorities. A plethora of other targeted agents, most backed by preclinical data, are in various stages of investigation. These include epigenetic and immune therapies, agents targeting cellular survival, metabolic and apoptotic pathways, the cell cycle, DNA repair, and protein folding and degradation, among others. However, at this time, none of these is close to registration or even in a pivotal trial, illustrating the difficulties in recapitulating the clinical disease in preclinical models. Most current clinical trials are testing the addition of a novel agent to ruxolitinib, either in the frontline setting or in the context of an insufficient response to ruxolitinib, or attempting to study new drugs in the second-line, "ruxolitinib failure" setting. Emerging data supports the addition of azacitidine to ruxolitinib in some patients. Other strategies have focused on improving cytopenias, through amelioration of bone marrow fibrosis or other mechanisms. This is important, because cytopenias are the commonest reason for ruxolitinib interruption and/or dose reduction, and dose optimization of ruxolitinib is tied to its survival benefit. The activin receptor ligand trap, sotatercept, and the anti-fibrotic agent, PRM-151, have shown promise in this regard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.