Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30675638›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019

Ecosystem services in different agro-climatic zones in eastern India: impact of land use and land cover change.

Rahul Tripathi, K C Moharana, A D Nayak, B Dhal, Md Shahid, B Mondal, S D Mohapatra, P Bhattacharyya, Nuala Fitton, Pete Smith and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rahul TripathiICAR - National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India.
K C MoharanaICAR - National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India.
A D NayakICAR - National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India.
B DhalICAR - National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India.
Md ShahidICAR - National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India.
B MondalICAR - National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India.
S D MohapatraICAR - National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India.
P BhattacharyyaICAR - National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India.
Nuala FittonInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK.
Pete SmithInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK.
A K ShuklaICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Sciences, Nabibagh, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
H PathakICAR - National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India.
A K NayakICAR - National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India. aknayak20@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land use and land cover (LULC) change have considerable influence on ecosystem services. Assessing change in ecosystem services due to LULC change at different spatial and temporal scales will help to identify suitable management practices for sustaining ecosystem productivity and maintaining the ecological balance. The objective of this study was to investigate variations in ecosystem services in response to LULC change over 27 years in four agro-climatic zones (ACZ) of eastern India using satellite imagery for the year 1989, 1996, 2005, 2011 (Landsat TM) and 2016 (Landsat 8 OLI). The satellite images were classified into six LULC classes, agriculture land, forest, waterbody, wasteland, built-up, and mining area. During the study period (1989 to 2016), forest cover reduced by 5.2%, 13.7%, and 3.6% in Sambalpur, Keonjhar, and Kandhamal districts of Odisha, respectively. In Balasore, agricultural land reduced by 17.2% due to its conversion to built-up land. The value of ecosystem services per unit area followed the order of waterbodies > agricultural land > forests. A different set of indicators, e.g., by explicitly including diversity, could change the rank between these land uses, so the temporal trends within a land use are more important than the absolute values. Total ecosystem services increased by US$ 1296.4 × 10

Indexed as

Climate ChangeAgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringForestsIndiaMiningSatellite ImageryAgro-climatic zoneEcosystem functionEcosystem service valueLand-use and land-cover change

Identifiers

PMID30675638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.