Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30675633›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2019

Tibiofemoral dislocation after primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Louis Rouquette, Roger Erivan, Bruno Pereira, Stéphane Boisgard, Stéphane Descamps, Guillaume Villatte

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Knee joint dislocations-Current epidemiology and treatment in Germany.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Anterior tibiofemoral dislocation after total knee arthroplasty: A case report and literature review.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Louis RouquetteService d'Orthopédie-Traumatologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU de Clermont Ferrand BP 69, 63003, Clermont Ferrand Cedex 01, France.
Roger ErivanService d'Orthopédie-Traumatologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU de Clermont Ferrand BP 69, 63003, Clermont Ferrand Cedex 01, France.
Bruno PereiraDRCI, CHU de Clermont Ferrand BP 69, 63003, Clermont Ferrand Cedex 01, France.
Stéphane BoisgardService d'Orthopédie-Traumatologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU de Clermont Ferrand BP 69, 63003, Clermont Ferrand Cedex 01, France.
Stéphane DescampsService d'Orthopédie-Traumatologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU de Clermont Ferrand BP 69, 63003, Clermont Ferrand Cedex 01, France.
Guillaume VillatteService d'Orthopédie-Traumatologie, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU de Clermont Ferrand BP 69, 63003, Clermont Ferrand Cedex 01, France. guillaumevillatte@hotmail.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-4322-6304
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTibiofemoral dislocation is the most serious form of instability following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is little reported in the literature, despite severity comparable to that in the native knee. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors and treatment strategies.

methodsThe Cochrane, Medline (via PubMed), Google, and PROSPERO data-bases were searched in January 2018 following the PRISMA meta-analysis guidelines. All articles referring to tibiofemoral dislocation following primary TKA were included for analysis and extraction of individual data. Study data comprised age, gender, comorbidities, primary and revision implant design, aetiology, and treatment strategy.

resultsIndividual data for 57 patients (23 studies) were analyzed. A total of 62.0% of primary implants were posterior-stabilized (49 patients) and 30.4% posterior-cruciate-retaining (24 patients). Obesity was the most frequent comorbidity (39.2%; 31 patients), followed by severe pre-operative deformity (31.6%; 25 patients). Aetiologies of dislocation were mainly related to comorbidity (15 studies; 65.2%) or intra-operative iatrogenic destabilization (14 studies; 60.9%). Non-operative treatment (splint) after dislocation was associated with high rates of recurrence (39.1%) but significantly fewer complications (p = 0.033). Implant revision surgery (45 patients; 80.4%) usually involved higher-constraint models (31 patients; 70.8%).

conclusionsImproved implant design has reduced the rate of tibiofemoral dislocation, although this complication remains serious in both the short and the long term. The present review identified patient- and surgeon-related risk factors. Awareness of the former, which are identifiable pre-operatively, and of the most frequent technical errors is critical.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeHumansKnee DislocationKnee JointKnee ProsthesisRisk FactorsComplicationKnee dislocationMeta-analysisTibiofemoralTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID30675633
OpenAlexW2912188291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.