ArticleJSES open access2017
Open shoulder stabilization: current trends and 1-year postoperative complications.
Article in JSES open access, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patients with cervical degenerative disease have greater post-operative opioid use and reoperation following shoulder instability procedures.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Distal Radius Allograft for Glenoid Reconstruction in Anterior Shoulder Instability With Significant Glenoid Bone Loss.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Anterior Shoulder Instability and Open Procedures: History, Indications, and Clinical Outcomes.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2023Review
- Risk for recurrent instability and reoperation following arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization in a large cross-sectional population.JSES international · 2022Article
- Open Stabilization Procedures of the Shoulder in the Athlete: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShoulder instability is commonly treated by arthroscopic stabilization. However, open stabilization procedures remain important in management of complex instability. Despite continued use of these procedures, the relative frequency of related complications remains poorly described. This study investigates current trends in open shoulder stabilization and characterizes major postoperative complications.
methodsPearlDiver, a national insurance database of orthopedic patients, was used to identify open shoulder stabilization procedures from 2007 to 2010.
resultsThere were 2678 open shoulder stabilization procedures performed, with a 1-year complication rate of 12.3%. Relative proportion of open Bankart repairs decreased (82.5% to 69.8%), whereas proportion of coracoid transfers increased (7.7% to 19%). Posterior glenoid bone grafting had the highest complication rate (20.7%). Rate of total complications was 9.8% in patients 10-24 years, 13.6% in patients 25-54 years, and 25.9% in patients >55 years.
conclusionsBased on our patient database sample, a significant decline in the relative use of open Bankart repair was observed. Our analysis indicates that the use of bone transfer procedures was correlated with significantly higher reoperation rates than open Bankart repair, particularly in the older patient cohort. Further studies comparing open stabilization procedures with contemporary arthroscopic techniques are indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.