Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30675493›Full record

ReviewVisceral medicine2018

Clinical Management of Appendicitis.

Peter Becker, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Dieter Schilling

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visceral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04462588 (Are the Changes in Immature Granulocyte Count and Percentage Significant in the Decision to Continue Medical Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis Cases), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04462588 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Are the Changes in Immature Granulocyte Count and Percentage Significant in the Decision to Continue Medical Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis Cases

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled64ConditionsAcute Appendicitis Without Peritonitis, Medical EmergenciesArmsCipro 400 MG in 200 ML Injection, Flagyl I.V. RTU, appendectomy (open or laparascopic)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acute Appendicitis in Childhood and Adulthood.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The role of CT in decision for acute appendicitis treatment.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Acute appendicitis-advances and controversies.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
  18. Where have all the appendicectomies gone?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021
    Observational
  19. Clinical Prediction Score for Ruptured Appendicitis in ED.Emergency medicine international · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter BeckerMedizinische Klinik II, Diakonissenkrankenhaus Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Stefan Fichtner-FeiglKlinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg i.Br., Germany.
Dieter SchillingMedizinische Klinik II, Diakonissenkrankenhaus Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Diakonissenkrankenhaus · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEver since the first appendectomy has been performed, surgery has been the standard of care for acute appendicitis, with antibiotic therapy being reserved for special situations. Recent studies have shown the feasibility of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis.

methodsThis clinical therapeutic review is based both on author expertise and a selective literature survey in PubMed based on the term 'appendicitis', combined with the terms 'acute', 'complicated', 'conservative', 'non-operative', 'therapy', 'surgery', and 'strategy'. According to these search results as well as to the treatment guidelines from the American College of Surgeons, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery, and World Society of Emergency Surgery, we present an interdisciplinary treatment concept.

resultsApproximately 90% of patients treated with antibiotics are able to avoid surgery during the initial admission. The other 10% that fail to respond to antibiotics require a rescue appendectomy. Recurrence rates of non-operated patients within 1 year are as high as 20-30%.

conclusionIn uncomplicated appendicitis without risk factors for failure of non-operative management, a shared decision based on the patient's preferences should be made. In cases with risk factors, appendectomy is still the treatment recommended. If the diagnosis is uncertain or clinical symptoms are rather mild, antibiotic therapy should be started. In complicated appendicitis, management depends on the clinical state, with either immediate surgery or primarily antibiotic therapy and combined with drainage of abscess, being followed by interval appendectomy in some cases.

Indexed as

Abdominal infectionsAcute appendicitisAntibiotic therapyComplicated appendicitisLaparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30675493
PMCPMC6341313
OpenAlexW2901658897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.