Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30675490›Full record

ReviewVisceral medicine2018

Minimally Invasive Surgery of Pancreatic Cancer: Feasibility and Rationale.

Dirk Bausch, Tobias Keck

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visceral medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05463328 (Open Versus Laparoscopic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05463328 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Open Versus Laparoscopic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Randomized Control Comparative Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsPancreas NeoplasmArmslaparoscopic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy, Open pancreaticduodenctomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dirk BauschDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Tobias KeckDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive pancreatic procedures, in particular minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy, are amongst the most technically challenging procedures in general surgery. Accordingly, a high number of cases is required to master the procedures. Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery is well established for benign and premalignant lesions of the pancreas. Borderline resectable tumors with infiltration of the portal vein are also resected minimally invasively in specialized centers with appropriate expertise. Retrospective and registry studies demonstrate an equivalent long-term survival compared to conventional surgery. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are also equivalent, whereas minimally invasive surgery significantly reduces hospital stay. We expect more widespread use of minimally invasive pancreatic procedures in large centers.

Indexed as

Laparoscopic surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryPancreatic cancerRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30675490
PMCPMC6341339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.