ArticleOncology letters2019
Systematic tracking of altered modules identifies the key biomarkers involved in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Key genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were investigated through systematically tracking the dysregulated modules from protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. Microarray data of normal subjects and CLL patients recruited from ArrayExpress database were applied to extract differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Additionally, we re-weighted the PPI network of normal and CLL conditions by means of Pearsons correlation coefficient (PCC). Furthermore, clique-merging method was applied to extract the modules and then the altered modules were screened out. The intersection genes were selected from miss and add genes in the altered modules. The common genes were screened from the intersection genes and DEGs in CLL. A total of 734 DEGs were screened by statistical analysis. In this investigation, there were 1,805 and 703 modules in normal as well as disease PPI network. In addition, 875 altered modules were obtained which included 145 miss genes, 353 add genes and 85 intersection genes. Finally, in-depth analysis revealed 9 mutual genes between the intersection genes and DEGs in CLL. Our analysis revealed several key genes associated with CLL by systematically tracking the dysregulated modules, which might be candidate targets for diagnosis and management of CLL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.