ArticleOncology letters2019
Prognostic evaluation of patients with resectable lung cancer using systemic inflammatory response parameters.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Impact of the Gustave Roussy Immune Score on Cancer-Specific Survival and Treatment Completion in Patients with Bladder Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Risk factors for postoperative hypoalbuminemia in ovarian cancer: a predictive nomogram.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Novel prediction model of early screening lung adenocarcinoma with pulmonary fibrosis based on haematological index.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Article
- Novel nutritional indicator as predictors among subtypes of lung cancer in diagnosis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Perioperative Inflammatory Response and Cancer Recurrence in Lung Cancer Surgery: A Narrative Review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Clinical Value of PLR, MLR, and NWR in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Preoperative Platelet to Albumin Ratio Predicts Outcome of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2021Article
- Association Between Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and All-Cause Mortality and Cause-Specific Mortality in US Adults, 1999-2014.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Logistic Regression for 30-days Survival Prediction of Cancer Patients.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2020Article
- Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicted Long-Term Chemotherapy Benefits In Stage IIIB-IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Without Sensitive Mutations.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-associated mortality. C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin (ALB), globulin (GLB), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been identified as general parameters for systemic inflammatory response (SIR). Furthermore, these parameters are also associated with tumor development and metastasis. The present study aimed to investigate the predictive values of these SIR parameters in patients with resectable lung cancer. In total, 101 patients with resectable lung cancer were recruited in the present study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the median value of pre-treatment CRP, ALB, GLB, LDH, NLR or PLR values. The post-/pre-treatment ratios were defined as the ratio of pre-treatment blood parameter values and the corresponding values obtained following therapy. A ratio of ≤1.1 indicated that the values were not increased, while a ratio of >1.1 suggested that the values were increased following treatment. Patients with lower pre-treatment ALB levels had poorer overall survival (OS) rates, whereas GLB, LDH, CRP, NLR or PLR levels were not associated with outcomes. Whole course treatment (surgery combined with adjuvant chemotherapy) significantly increased the value of ALB, but decreased the value of NLR, whereas it had no effect on the values of LDH, CRP or PLR. Post-/pre-treatment LDH and PLR were associated with outcomes. Post-/pre-treatment ALB, GLB, CRP and NLR were not associated with outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that a low pre-treatment ALB level and increased post-/pre-treatment PLR were independent risk factors affecting OS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that an ALB value of 47.850 g/l was considered to be the optimal cut-off value for prognosis; the sensitivity was 28.8% and specificity was 95.9%. It was suggested that the pre-treatment ALB and post-/pre-treatment PLR may be potential prognostic factors in resectable lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.