Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30675285›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

Synchronous endometrioid endometrial and ovarian carcinomas are biologically related: A clinico-pathological and molecular (next generation sequencing) study of 22 cases.

Nikola Hájková, Ivana Tichá, Jan Hojný, Kristýna Němejcová, Michaela Bártů, Romana Michálková, Michal Zikán, David Cibula, Jan Laco, Tomáš Geryk and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Summary ofGenes · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikola HájkováInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
Ivana TicháInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan HojnýInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
Kristýna NěmejcováInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
Michaela BártůInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
Romana MichálkováInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal ZikánDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bulovka Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 18081 Prague, Czech Republic.
David CibulaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncogynecological Centre, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan LacoThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Tomáš GerykThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Gábor MéhesDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Pavel DundrInstitute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
General University Hospital in Prague · CZCharles University · CZUniversity Hospital Hradec Králové · CZUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The criteria for distinction between independent primary tumors and metastasis from one site to the other in synchronous endometrioid endometrial and ovarian carcinoma (SEO) has been a matter of dispute for a long time. In our study we performed a comprehensive clinico-pathological and molecular analysis of 22 cases of SEO. Based on conventional clinico-pathological criteria the cases were classified as independent primary tumors (10 cases) and metastasis from one location to the other (12 cases). All tumors were analyzed by NGS with a panel of 73 genes (219 kbp). Clonal origin was confirmed in all cases by at least one shared mutation in

Indexed as

endometrial carcinomaendometrioid carcinomaNGSovarian carcinomasynchronous tumors

Identifiers

PMID30675285
PMCPMC6341770
OpenAlexW2905089141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.