Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30675212›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

Higher nuclear EGFR expression is a better predictor of survival in rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy than cytoplasmic EGFR expression.

Ching-Chieh Yang, Li-Ching Lin, Yu-Wei Lin, Yu-Feng Tian, Chen-Yi Lin, Ming-Jen Sheu, Chien-Feng Li, Ming-Hong Tai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nuclear epidermal growth factor receptor as a therapeutic target.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023
    Review
  6. Signal Crosstalk and the Role of Estrogen Receptor beta (ERβ) in Prostate Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ching-Chieh YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71069, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Li-Ching LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71069, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Yu-Wei LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71069, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Yu-Feng TianDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71069, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chen-Yi LinDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71069, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Ming-Jen SheuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71069, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chien-Feng LiDepartment of Pathology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71069, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Ming-Hong TaiDepartment of Biotechnology, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan 71005, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chi Mei Medical Center · TWNational Sun Yat-sen University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of cytoplasmic (-C) and nuclear epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-N) expression in rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). A total of 172 newly diagnosed rectal cancer patients post-neoadjuvant CCRT and curative surgery, treated between January 1998 to December 2008, were included. Pathological tissues used for evaluation were biopsy specimens obtained prior to CCRT, and specimens collected at surgery. EGFR expression in the nucleus and cytoplasm was assessed by immunohistochemistry tests. An intensity of 3+ EGFR reactivity in the cytoplasm (and/or membrane) of tumor cells was defined as overexpression of EGFR-C. The cutoff percentage of immunoreactive tumor cells for EGFR-N overexpression was 50%. Expression levels of EGFR-C and EGFR-N were further analyzed by clinicopathological features for 5-year survival disease-specific survival (DSS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and metastasis-free survival (MeFS). The results revealed that 20.9 and 23.3% of the cohort had high EGFR-N and EGFR-C expression, respectively. EGFR-N overexpression was significantly associated with advanced pre-treatment tumor stage (T3 and 4; P=0.017) and post-treatment tumor stage (T3 and 4; P<0.001). In univariate analysis, EGFR-N overexpression was significantly associated with poorer DSS (P=0.0005), MeFS (P=0.0182), and LRFS (P=0.0014). Furthermore, it remained an independent prognosticator of worse DSS [P=0.007, hazard ratio (HR)=2.755] and LRFS (P=0.0164, HR=3.026) in multivariate analysis. Overexpression of EGFR-N, and not EGFR-C, may help identify rectal cancer patients who have an increased risk of local recurrence and poor survival following neoadjuvant CCRT.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapyepidermal growth factor receptornuclearrectal cancersurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID30675212
PMCPMC6341901
OpenAlexW2903268078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.