Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30675168›Full record

ArticleStem cells international2018

Quiescent Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Are More Resistant to Heat Stress than Cycling Cells.

L L Alekseenko, M A Shilina, O G Lyublinskaya, J S Kornienko, O V Anatskaya, A E Vinogradov, T M Grinchuk, I I Fridlyanskaya, N N Nikolsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Biobridge: An Outlook on Translational Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L L AlekseenkoInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-9961
M A ShilinaInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2228-5567
O G LyublinskayaInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3128-4558
J S KornienkoPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7876-230X
O V AnatskayaInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4538-8056
A E VinogradovInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5540-8896
T M GrinchukInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3566-4910
I I FridlyanskayaInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7913-8472
N N NikolskyInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Institute of Cytology · RUPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quiescence is the prevailing state of many cell types under homeostatic conditions. Yet, surprisingly, little is known about how quiescent cells respond to environmental challenges. The aim of the present study is to compare stress responses of cycling and quiescent mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). Human endometrial mesenchymal cells (eMSС) were employed as adult stem cells. eMSC quiescence was modeled by serum starvation. Sublethal heat shock (HS) was used as a stress factor. Both quiescent and cycling cells were heated at 45°C for 30 min and then returned to standard culture conditions for their recovery. HS response was monitored by DNA damage response, stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS), cell proliferation activity, and oxidative metabolism. It has been found that quiescent cells repair DNA more rapidly, resume proliferation, and undergo SIPS less than proliferating cells. HS-enforced ROS production in heated cycling cells was accompanied with increased expression of genes regulating redox-active proteins. Quiescent cells exposed to HS did not intensify the ROS production, and genes involved in antioxidant defense were mostly silent. Altogether, the results have shown that quiescent cells are more resistant to heat stress than cycling cells. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) demonstrates that HS-survived cells retain differentiation capacity and do not exhibit signs of spontaneous transformation.

Identifiers

PMID30675168
PMCPMC6323451
OpenAlexW2905778141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.