ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Surgically Complex Cases: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery: A Single-Center 70-Case Series Experience.Cureus · 2026Article
- Modified Use of Classical Rein Technique in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterine Manipulation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Approaches: Comparative Learning Curves and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus V-NOTES Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Surgical outcomes of robotic hysterectomy for large uterus weighing more than 1000 g: a retrospective study from a high-volume center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Charting Proficiency: The Learning Curve in Robotic Hysterectomy for Large Uteri Exceeding 1000 g.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- How does robotic surgery affect gynecology patient care?Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Effect of Uterine Weight on the Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy in Benign Indications.Cureus · 2024Article
- Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy in gynecologic benign disease: a single-center cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Multi-Institutional Trends in Gynecological Robotic Surgery in India: A Real-World Scenario.Cureus · 2023Article
- Learning Curve Analysis of Single-Site Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2021Review
- Safety and feasibility of the three-port robot-assisted hysterectomy across uterine weights.Journal of robotic surgery · 2021Article
- Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS).JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
- Trocar Configuration in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyReview
- Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesWe compared the outcome of robotic hysterectomy (RH) with laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) for large uteri (≥16 weeks).
methodsThis was a retrospective review over 5 years of 165 women (RH, 46; LH, 119). Demographic data, conversion, hemoglobin drop, indication, operating time, postoperative stay, and intra-operative strategies (adhesiolysis, myomectomy) were recorded.
resultsMean age was 45.7 ± 6.4 years and 44.5 ± 5.4 years (no diff) and body mass index was 30.2 ± 6.3 kg/m
conclusionA higher body mass index, more adhesiolysis, and difficult bladder dissection imply a more challenging nature of women who underwent RH. Despite this, RH was shown to be feasible and safe with a lower blood loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.