Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30674936›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Detection of a microbial source tracking marker by isothermal helicase-dependent amplification and a nucleic acid lateral-flow strip test.

Claudia Kolm, Roland Martzy, Manuela Führer, Robert L Mach, Rudolf Krska, Sabine Baumgartner, Andreas H Farnleitner, Georg H Reischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudia KolmTU Wien, Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering, Molecular Diagnostics Group, Department IFA-Tulln, Tulln, Austria.
Roland MartzyTU Wien, Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering, Molecular Diagnostics Group, Department IFA-Tulln, Tulln, Austria.
Manuela FührerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Department IFA-Tulln, Center for Analytical Chemistry, Tulln, Austria.
Robert L MachTU Wien, Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering, Research Division Biochemical Technology, Research Group Synthetic Biology and Molecular Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.
Rudolf KrskaUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Department IFA-Tulln, Center for Analytical Chemistry, Tulln, Austria.
Sabine BaumgartnerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Department IFA-Tulln, Center for Analytical Chemistry, Tulln, Austria.
Andreas H FarnleitnerICC Interuniversity Cooperation Centre Water & Health, Vienna, Austria.
Georg H ReischerTU Wien, Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering, Molecular Diagnostics Group, Department IFA-Tulln, Tulln, Austria. georg.reischer@tuwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-3962-8685

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decades, various PCR-based methods have been proposed that can identify sources of faecal pollution in environmental waters. These microbial source tracking (MST) methods are powerful tools to manage water quality and support public health risk assessment. However, their application is limited by the lack of specialized equipment and trained personnel in laboratories performing microbiological water quality assessment. Here, we describe a novel molecular method that combines helicase-dependent amplification (HDA) with a strip test for detecting ruminant faecal pollution sources. Unlike quantitative PCR (qPCR), the developed HDA-strip assay only requires a heating block to amplify the ruminant-associated Bacteroidetes 16S rRNA marker (BacR). Following HDA, the reaction mixture can be directly applied onto the test strip, which detects and displays the amplification products by marker-specific hybridization probes via an on-strip colorimetric reaction. The entire assay takes two hours and demands no extensive practical training. Furthermore, the BacR HDA-strip assay achieved comparable results in head-to-head performance tests with the qPCR reference, in which we investigated source-sensitivity and source-specificity, the analytical limit of detection, and the sample limit of detection. Although this approach only yields qualitative results, it can pave a way for future simple-to-use MST screening tools.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesBacteroidetesDNA, BacterialDNA HelicasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA HelicasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30674936
PMCPMC6344534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.