Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30674917›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Metabolic phenotype of breast-fed infants, and infants fed standard formula or bovine MFGM supplemented formula: a randomized controlled trial.

Xuan He, Mariana Parenti, Tove Grip, Magnus Domellöf, Bo Lönnerdal, Olle Hernell, Niklas Timby, Carolyn M Slupsky

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of proteome research · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuan HeDepartment of Nutrition, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Mariana ParentiDepartment of Nutrition, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Tove GripDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, SE 901 85 Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Magnus DomellöfDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, SE 901 85 Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Bo LönnerdalDepartment of Nutrition, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Olle HernellDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, SE 901 85 Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Niklas TimbyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, SE 901 85 Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Carolyn M SlupskyDepartment of Nutrition, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. cslupsky@ucdavis.edu.
Umeå University · SEUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

ACQUISITION OF 500 MHZ NMR SPECTROMETERS10RR011973 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LA MAR, GERD N · 1997 to 1997
–
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR011973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formula-fed (FF) infants exhibit a different metabolic profile than breast-fed (BF) infants. Two potential mechanisms are the higher protein level in formula compared with breast milk and the removal of the milk fat and associated milk fat globule membranes (MFGM) during production of infant formula. To determine whether MFGM may impact metabolism, formula-fed infants were randomly assigned to receive either an MFGM isolate-supplemented experimental formula (EF) or a standard formula (SF) from 2 until 6 months and compared with a BF reference group. Infants consuming EF had higher levels of fatty acid oxidation products compared to infants consuming SF. Although the protein level in the study formula was approximately 12 g/L (lower than most commercial formulas), a metabolic difference between FF and BF remained such that FF infants had higher levels of amino acid catabolism by-products and a low efficiency of amino acid clearance (preference for protein metabolism). BF infants had higher levels of fatty acid oxidation products (preference for fat metabolism). These unique, energy substrate-driven metabolic outcomes did not persist after diet was shifted to weaning foods and appeared to be disrupted by complementary feeding. Our results suggest that MFGM may have a role in directing infant metabolism.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingFeeding BehaviorInfant FormulaMetabolomeFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMetabolomicsPlasma

Identifiers

PMID30674917
PMCPMC6344597
OpenAlexW2913108958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.