Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30674662›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Escape band in

Xuanqi Zhang, Guangwei Si, Yiming Dong, Kaiyue Chen, Qi Ouyang, Chunxiong Luo, Yuhai Tu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuanqi ZhangThe State Key Laboratory for Artificial Microstructures and Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Guangwei SiThe State Key Laboratory for Artificial Microstructures and Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4945-9413
Yiming DongCenter for Quantitative Biology, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Kaiyue ChenThe State Key Laboratory for Artificial Microstructures and Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Qi OuyangThe State Key Laboratory for Artificial Microstructures and Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Chunxiong LuoThe State Key Laboratory for Artificial Microstructures and Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; yuhai@us.ibm.com pkuluocx@pku.edu.cn.
Yuhai TuPhysical Sciences Department, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 yuhai@us.ibm.com pkuluocx@pku.edu.cn.
Peking University · CNPhysical Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

Quantitative Modeling of Signal Transduction in Bacterial ChemotaxisR01GM081747 · NIGMS · IBM THOMAS J. WATSON RESEARCH CENTER · PI TU, YUHAI · 2007 to 2018
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is commonly believed that bacterial chemotaxis helps cells find food. However, not all attractants are nutrients, and not all nutrients are strong attractants. Here, by using microfluidic experiments, we studied

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChemotactic FactorsChemotaxisEscherichia coliMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesModels, BiologicalNutrientsReproducibility of ResultsChemotactic FactorsNutrientschemotaxisgrowthopposing gradientstraveling wave

Identifiers

PMID30674662
PMCPMC6369777
OpenAlexW2913190827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.