Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30674609›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2019

Priorities for Pediatric Patient Safety Research.

James M Hoffman, Nicholas J Keeling, Christopher B Forrest, Heather L Tubbs-Cooley, Erin Moore, Emily Oehler, Stephanie Wilson, Elisabeth Schainker, Kathleen E Walsh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parental involvement in paediatric patient safety incidents in general practice: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Identifying research priorities with children, youth, and families: A scoping review.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

James M HoffmanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and.
Nicholas J KeelingDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and.
Christopher B ForrestDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Heather L Tubbs-CooleyDivision of Nursing, Research in Patient Services.
Erin MooreDepartment of Pulmonology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Emily OehlerJames M. Anderson Center of Health Systems Excellence, and.
Stephanie WilsonJames M. Anderson Center of Health Systems Excellence, and.
Elisabeth SchainkerFranciscan Children's, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Kathleen E WalshJames M. Anderson Center of Health Systems Excellence, and kathleen.walsh@cchmc.org.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USFranciscan Hospital for Children · USOffice of Patient Care Services · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC)R24GM115264 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI KLEIN, TERI ELLEN, RELLING, MARY V · 2015 to 2017
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM115264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: media-1vid110.1542/5972296743001PEDS-VA_2018-0496

methodsThe Children's Hospitals Solutions for Patient Safety Network is a network of >100 children's hospitals working together to eliminate harm due to health care. Parents and site leaders responded to an open-ended, anonymous e-mail survey used to elicit research topics. A key stakeholder panel winnowed related topics and prioritized topics using Likert scale ratings. Site leaders and parents responded to a second anonymous e-mail survey and rated the importance of each topic. Health system executive interviews were used to elicit their opinions regarding top priorities for patient-safety research.

resultsThe elicitation survey had 107 respondents who produced 49 unique research topics. The key stakeholder panel developed a final list of 24 topics. The prioritization survey had 74 respondents. Top-priority research topics concerned high reliability, safety culture, open communication, and early detection of patient deterioration and sepsis. During 7 qualitative interviews, health system executives highlighted diagnostic error, medication safety, deterioration, and ambulatory patient safety as priority areas.

conclusionsWith this study, we take a first step toward a stakeholder-driven research agenda on the basis of the assumption that stakeholders are best positioned to determine what research will be used to address the problems of most concern to them.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services ResearchHospitals, PediatricHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30674609
PMCPMC6361358
OpenAlexW2913891591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.