Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30674487›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2019

Choice architecture interventions to improve diet and/or dietary behaviour by healthcare staff in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Lena Al-Khudairy, Olalekan A Uthman, Rosemary Walmsley, Samantha Johnson, Oyinlola Oyebode

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Prompting consumers to make healthier food choices in hospitals: a cluster randomised controlled trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Trial
  5. Nudge for governmental change in health policy.Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. A Scoping Review of Choice Architecture to Promote Healthy Nutrition in Health and Care Settings.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lena Al-KhudairyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Olalekan A UthmanWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Rosemary WalmsleyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Samantha JohnsonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Oyinlola OyebodeWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
University of Warwick · GBUniversity of Worcester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe were commissioned by the behavioural insights team at Public Health England to synthesise the evidence on choice architecture interventions to increase healthy purchasing and/or consumption of food and drink by National Health Service (NHS) staff. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts and Web of Science were searched from inception until May 2017 and references were screened independently by two reviewers.

designA systematic review that included randomised experimental or intervention studies, interrupted time series and controlled before and after studies.

participantsHealthcare staff of high-income countries.

interventionChoice architecture interventions that aimed to improve dietary purchasing and/or consumption (outcomes) of staff. APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Eligibility assessment, quality appraisal, data abstraction and analysis were completed by two reviewers. Quality appraisal of randomised trials was informed by the

resultsEighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Five studies included multiple workplaces (including healthcare settings), 13 were conducted in healthcare settings only. Interventions in 10 studies were choice architecture only and 8 studies involved a complex intervention with a choice architecture element. Interventions involving a proximity element (making behavioural options easier or harder to engage with) appear to be frequently effective at changing behaviour. One study presented an effective sizing intervention. Labelling alone was generally not effective at changing purchasing behaviour. Interventions including an availability element were generally reported to be successful at changing behaviour but no included study examined this element alone. There was no strong evidence for the effect of pricing on purchasing or dietary intake.

conclusionProximity, availability and sizing are choice architecture elements that are likely to be effective for NHS organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017064872.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyEnergy IntakeEnglandFeeding BehaviorHealth PersonnelHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicState Medicinechoice architecturediethealth carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID30674487
PMCPMC6347858
OpenAlexW2914771830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.